From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Guile-GDBM 1.1.0 available Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:53:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87a9kir7zp.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: <878v06hhfs.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <87mwoj7y0k.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376600050 28297 80.91.229.3 (15 Aug 2013 20:54:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 15 22:54:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VA4YY-0005C7-T4 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:54:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55488 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VA4YY-0001Ie-Jy for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55023) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VA4YK-0001Bm-55 for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:53:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VA4VU-0000Gz-Aw for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp209.alice.it ([82.57.200.105]:43588) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VA4VN-0000DE-0p; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:50:49 -0400 Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (62.211.148.14) by smtp209.alice.it (8.6.060.28) id 51F283DB03FDF06F; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:50:47 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VA4YC-00046x-0I; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:53:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87mwoj7y0k.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:51:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.105 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10639 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) () Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:51:39 +0200 I think it would be great to submit it for inclusion in GDBM itself, as an optional feature. [...] because the GDBM API is stable. I agree that the GDBM API is stable. However... WDYT? Guile-GDBM takes moderate pains to handle various Guile versions (in addition to various GDBM versions). I would not wish to impose this hair (including ttn-style issues) on the GDBM hacker just yet. OTOH, everything here is Free Software, so i'd be delighted to find Guile-GDBM obsoleted by inclusion (of the hair) in some future GDBM release. (The job is feasible, if Someone (not me) is motivated.) =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 (if you're human and you know it) read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical) (not (via 'mailing-list))) =3D> nil --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlINP9EACgkQZwMiJEyAdQJ+IwCZAUXTpCuTDjKMMCof+bA1v8ys NbMAmgLH7oHaBxbLOIoZg535yXz/sQMJ =CNnb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--