From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 15:09:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87a88zak7v.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <2e4e293e-618e-809a-2eff-31576319ea61@gmx.de> <874lzod28a.fsf@web.de> <6deb1610-e31b-b5c2-e9c9-95a2289af216@gmx.de> <87mvdfs6mh.fsf@web.de> <871sued8h7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87tw78sj34.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488723020 3262 195.159.176.226 (5 Mar 2017 14:10:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:10:20 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Thomas Morley Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 05 15:10:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ckWrV-0000HG-Ud for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 15:10:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38924 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckWrb-0002gD-VA for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:10:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55608) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckWr7-0002fJ-QB for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:09:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckWr2-0004sr-MV for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:09:49 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59349) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckWr2-0004sk-J9; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:09:44 -0500 Original-Received: from x2f43d26.dyn.telefonica.de ([2.244.61.38]:36078 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ckWr1-0002wU-Mx; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:09:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Thomas Morley's message of "Sun, 5 Mar 2017 15:01:06 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13409 Archived-At: Thomas Morley writes: > Here some timing values > > (1) > lilypond-2.19.52 using guile 1.8.7 > (I would have prefered to build lilypond with a guile-1.8.8 build from > the guile-repository. Though my try to build it from the > branch_release-1-8 failed. Instead attempting to fix it, I then used a > released lilypond-version) > > real 8m16.191s > user 6m39.864s > sys 0m10.860s > > (2) > guile-2.0.14 build from guile-git-repository, branch remotes/origin/stable-2.0 > lilypond-2.19.56, build from local branch dev/guile-v2.2-work > > real 34m11.762s > user 45m11.316s > sys 0m5.604s > > (3) > guile-2.1.7 build from guile-git-repository, branch master > (I've got this warning: > configure: WARNING: *** GNU Readline is too old on your system. > configure: WARNING: *** You need readline version 2.1 or later. > No idea whether this may have an impact on lilyponds compiling-time > I'll have to test.) > lilypond-2.19.56, build from local branch dev/guile-v2.2-work > > real 67m29.132s > user 93m14.812s > sys 0m7.332s Same compilation options? This looks like a surprisingly serious regression compared to 2.0. -- David Kastrup