From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Controlling optimizations in 2.2
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:10:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a88pe07i.fsf_-_@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 874lyxs5i0.fsf@pobox.com
Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> skribis:
> Incidentally in 2.2 the options you need to turn off optimization are a
> little more complicated. We have "guild compile -O0" which will produce
> the right set of options but nothing like #:optimize-level 0 or
> something that you can pass to `compile'.
What would you recommend as the main optimization to turn off in 2.2 if
one is to reduce compile time?
I’m asking in the context of Guix, where there’s no much to optimize in
files that just define packages.
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-13 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-20 6:05 How to make GNU Guile more successful Michael Vehrs
2017-02-20 20:41 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2017-02-21 6:01 ` Michael Vehrs
2017-02-21 17:18 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2017-02-21 18:19 ` Amirouche
2017-02-21 18:31 ` Mike Gran
2017-02-21 18:33 ` Amirouche
2017-02-21 18:41 ` Mike Gran
2017-02-21 18:15 ` Amirouche
2017-02-21 19:25 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2017-03-01 19:25 ` Amirouche
2017-03-03 5:28 ` Nala Ginrut
2017-03-03 9:18 ` David Kastrup
2017-03-03 11:30 ` Nala Ginrut
2017-03-03 12:19 ` David Kastrup
2017-03-03 13:35 ` Nala Ginrut
2017-03-04 23:44 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2017-03-05 2:05 ` Thomas Morley
2017-03-05 14:01 ` Thomas Morley
2017-03-05 14:09 ` David Kastrup
2017-03-05 14:13 ` Thomas Morley
2017-03-05 14:27 ` Thomas Morley
2017-03-06 20:41 ` Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful) Andy Wingo
2017-03-08 23:17 ` Thomas Morley
2017-03-08 23:50 ` David Kastrup
2017-03-09 6:48 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2017-03-09 12:13 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-03-09 13:28 ` Paul
2017-03-10 16:18 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-03-10 18:53 ` Paul
2017-03-12 21:07 ` Thomas Morley
2017-03-12 21:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-03-12 23:20 ` Matt Wette
2017-03-13 12:52 ` Andy Wingo
2017-03-13 14:10 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2017-03-13 21:26 ` Controlling optimizations in 2.2 Andy Wingo
2017-03-03 17:21 ` How to make GNU Guile more successful Matt Wette
2017-03-03 19:09 ` Amirouche
2017-03-03 19:16 ` Amirouche
2017-03-03 19:24 ` Mike Gran
2017-03-03 20:10 ` Matt Wette
2017-03-03 20:09 ` Matt Wette
2017-02-22 5:51 ` Michael Vehrs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a88pe07i.fsf_-_@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).