From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:34:29 -0400 Message-ID: <878uzpa7ju.fsf@tines.lan> References: <83vc2wj4hz.fsf@gnu.org> <83li3siues.fsf@gnu.org> <838uzrioqr.fsf@gnu.org> <83mwo5hjut.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjs5aeps.fsf@tines.lan> <83li3phdcp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1377459300 12857 80.91.229.3 (25 Aug 2013 19:35:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 25 21:35:02 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VDg5V-000207-Fr for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:35:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47430 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VDg5V-0001Sr-3m for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:35:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50083) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VDg5I-0001Sg-A8 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:34:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VDg5D-0000Ik-1N for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:34:48 -0400 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:40257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VDg5C-0000If-Tu; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:34:42 -0400 Original-Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=tines.lan) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VDg56-0007kW-J3; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:34:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83li3phdcp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:47:18 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 96.39.62.75 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10699 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Mark H Weaver >> Cc: Panicz Maciej Godek , guile-user@gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:59:43 -0400 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > I guess you didn't configure without threads on GNU/Linux, did you? >> > If not, I suggest to try that, my impression is that Guile without >> > threads is not used too much on Posix platforms. >> >> Hydra, a continuous integration system, runs Guile's "make check" with >> threads disabled on several POSIX platforms, so there's no need for >> Panicz to do this test. > > Sorry, I disagree. "make check" is not the issue here: Guile passes > it on my machine with flying colors (see my reports back then). And > yet a simple program shown by Panicz aborts due to "stack overflow". > I was suggesting to configure Guile on GNU/Linux without threads and > run that same program: perhaps it will also fail. Okay, I stand corrected. Thanks, Mark