Re: Can guile be implementation independent?

["Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_bab@web.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1062 bytes --]

>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021, 09:43 Jacob Hrbek <kreyren@rixotstudio.cz> wrote:
>>>    Is there a way to do the same on GNU Guile? Like writing a code
>>>    that can
>>>    be interpreted by implementations that are following the IEEE
>>>    1178-2008
>>>    or R7RS standard?
>> On 12/17/21 03:53, Nala Ginrut wrote:
>>> Hi Jacob!
>>> You may take a look at akku.scm
>>> You can write r7rs code and use Guile as one of the compiler alternatives.
>> On 17 Dec 2021, at 03:01, Jacob Hrbek <kreyren@rixotstudio.cz> wrote:
>> Looks interesting, are there any known limitations in relation to Guile?
silas poulson <silas8642@hotmail.co.uk> writes:
> Uncertain if anymore but Guile provides list of r7rs incompatiblities
> here
> <https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/R7RS-Incompatibilities.html>

The short of this: Call guile with --r7rs and the main incompatibility
is missing reading of circular data structures with datum labels.

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 1125 bytes --]