From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Problem with cond macro. Date: 07 May 2002 20:41:33 +0200 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <877kmfls0y.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020799138 12045 127.0.0.1 (7 May 2002 19:18:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 19:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Keith Wright , Guile User Mailing List Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 175AUD-00038A-00 for ; Tue, 07 May 2002 21:18:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 175ATE-0002M3-00; Tue, 07 May 2002 15:17:56 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip59.dokom.de ([195.138.42.59] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1759u2-0007qT-00 for ; Tue, 07 May 2002 14:41:34 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 3730 invoked by uid 1000); 7 May 2002 18:41:33 -0000 Original-To: Dirk Herrmann In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:393 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:393 Dirk Herrmann writes: > On 26 Apr 2002, Marius Vollmer wrote: > > > Dirk Herrmann writes: > > > > > Well, I'm not sure I understand all of this: What about the following: > > > > > > (define => #f) > > > (cond (#t => 'ok)) > > > > > > Should this also deliver 'ok ? It doesn't seem to with the current > > > implementation of syncase. > > > > Syncase is not really totally integrated with the module system yet, I > > think. That's why it can be confused by top-level bindings. > > OK, but can you definitely say "Yes, it should deliver 'ok" or not? I can't say that definitely. > I am not sure it is said explicitly in R5RS. If a macro introduces > a bound identifier, it is renamed in the subforms. I am not sure if > and how this applies for 'define. I'd say that define also binds identifiers, but I'm no expert on syntax-case, by far. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user