From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:03:04 +0200 Message-ID: <877gf98ufr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83vc2wj4hz.fsf@gnu.org> <83li3siues.fsf@gnu.org> <838uzrioqr.fsf@gnu.org> <83mwo5hjut.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjs5aeps.fsf@tines.lan> <83li3phdcp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1377464855 654 80.91.229.3 (25 Aug 2013 21:07:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:07:35 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 25 23:07:37 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VDhX6-0000MS-Ud for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 23:07:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47640 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VDhX6-0004xR-DR for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 17:07:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45332) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VDfcc-0003lh-5d for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:05:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VDfcX-00089j-QD for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50545) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VDfcX-000889-KJ for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VDfcV-00014l-Q5 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:05:03 +0200 Original-Received: from vil93-2-82-66-223-114.fbx.proxad.net ([82.66.223.114]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:05:03 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by vil93-2-82-66-223-114.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:05:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 31 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: vil93-2-82-66-223-114.fbx.proxad.net X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 8 Fructidor an 221 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cZQZF+ogdmYqZrDwwdHwwqvS3sw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 17:07:13 -0400 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10707 Archived-At: Hi Eli, Eli Zaretskii skribis: >> From: Mark H Weaver >> Cc: Panicz Maciej Godek , guile-user@gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:59:43 -0400 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > I guess you didn't configure without threads on GNU/Linux, did you? >> > If not, I suggest to try that, my impression is that Guile without >> > threads is not used too much on Posix platforms. >> >> Hydra, a continuous integration system, runs Guile's "make check" with >> threads disabled on several POSIX platforms, so there's no need for >> Panicz to do this test. > > Sorry, I disagree. "make check" is not the issue here: Guile passes > it on my machine with flying colors (see my reports back then). And > yet a simple program shown by Panicz aborts due to "stack overflow". > I was suggesting to configure Guile on GNU/Linux without threads and > run that same program: perhaps it will also fail. In test-suite/standalone, there are several tests that look similar (or more complex) than this test program–e.g., test-scm-with-guile.c. Do you think there’s any relevant difference here? Thanks, Ludo’.