From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Possible Memory Leak with stream-for-each Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:49:19 +0200 Message-ID: <8762yoe2eo.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283431792 4207 80.91.229.12 (2 Sep 2010 12:49:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 02 14:49:51 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Or9Ek-0006Oh-Qh for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:49:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44503 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Or9Ek-0007zQ-6i for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:49:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53844 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Or9Ec-0007y6-Ln for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:49:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Or9Eb-00007H-7d for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:49:42 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:48402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Or9Eb-00006o-2C for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:49:41 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Or9EV-0006G1-AE for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:49:35 +0200 Original-Received: from yoda.fdn.fr ([80.67.169.18]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:49:35 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by yoda.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:49:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Followup-To: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: yoda.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 Fructidor an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volutio?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?n?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BRhlleKuFoVBzaR2/iU+ym8E1BI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8139 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10835 Archived-At: Hello! I believe this patch fixes the problem: http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=f57fdf07d6374028f35bcb1ee748a94022deda6d Basically ‘force’ was leaking memory because it uses ‘lock-mutex’, which was the culprit (!). Julian: Could you please review this patch? Thanks, Ludo’.