unofficial mirror of guile-user@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.ping.de>
Subject: Re: guile -s  is it necessary?
Date: 20 Oct 2002 18:13:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874rbhxf4h.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3bs5qdxmy.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>

prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:

> Ok, I thought of another possible problem.  Suppose a program wants
> to invoke guile to process a script.  If -s is required, then the
> program will use it.  If -s is optional, the programmer will be
> tempted to use the plain "guile $script_name" form, which will be
> buggy if script_name can start with "-".

Yes, that's a good argument in favor of using "-s".  The documentation
of the option-less way of running a script should definitely talk
about this.

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405


_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user


  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-20 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-15 12:21 guile -s is it necessary? tomas
2002-10-15 21:40 ` Rob Browning
2002-10-15 21:46   ` Paul Jarc
2002-10-16 19:27     ` Neil Jerram
2002-10-18 19:04       ` Paul Jarc
2002-10-16  7:51   ` tomas
2002-10-15 22:36 ` Neil Jerram
2002-10-18 19:07 ` Paul Jarc
2002-10-18 22:06   ` Marius Vollmer
2002-10-19  4:40     ` Paul Jarc
2002-10-18 22:07 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-10-19 10:53   ` Neil Jerram
2002-10-19 11:21     ` Marius Vollmer
2002-10-20 17:45       ` Robert Uhl <ruhl@4dv.net>
2002-10-21  5:13         ` Rob Browning
2002-10-21 14:41           ` Robert Uhl <ruhl@4dv.net>
2002-10-20 21:11   ` Joshua Judson Rosen
2002-10-21  5:32     ` Paul Jarc
2002-10-19 19:41 ` Paul Jarc
2002-10-20 16:13   ` Marius Vollmer [this message]
2002-10-20 17:46   ` Robert Uhl <ruhl@4dv.net>
2002-10-21  5:28     ` Paul Jarc
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-25 15:04 Sven Hartrumpf
2002-10-25 20:43 ` Paul Jarc
2002-10-25 22:10   ` Rob Browning
2002-10-26 12:22     ` Neil Jerram
2002-10-26 16:29       ` Rob Browning

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874rbhxf4h.fsf@zagadka.ping.de \
    --to=mvo@zagadka.ping.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).