From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Trying guile as an extention language for a 'real world' product Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 11:08:29 +0200 Message-ID: <874ogepa7m.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <20100703053651.GA13073@yeeloong> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278321110 18586 80.91.229.12 (5 Jul 2010 09:11:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 09:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user To: rixed@happyleptic.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 05 11:11:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVhiO-0006pi-AF for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 11:11:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53006 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OVhiN-0005eM-J0 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 05:11:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37114 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OVhho-0005dk-KE for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 05:11:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVhhn-0001fc-8i for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 05:11:12 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp205.alice.it ([82.57.200.101]:39596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVhhn-0001fM-1e for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 05:11:11 -0400 Original-Received: from ambire.localdomain (95.236.70.235) by smtp205.alice.it (8.5.124.08) id 4C1A26450127614B; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 11:11:02 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVhfB-0001lQ-Bg; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 11:08:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20100703053651.GA13073@yeeloong> (rixed@happyleptic.org's message of "Sat, 3 Jul 2010 07:36:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7957 Archived-At: () rixed@happyleptic.org () Sat, 3 Jul 2010 07:36:51 +0200 Are there any contraindication against using guile as an extention language for configuration ? I don't think so. Configuration is specialization, moved early. Guile can handle that, as long as early is not too early. thi