From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Guile-SDL 0.4.0 available Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:30:51 +0100 Message-ID: <874nx0a8ro.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87obvaulws.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87mxauuipf.fsf@pobox.com> <877h1xti6q.fsf@Kagami.home> <87iplgg4b3.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1324046086 14615 80.91.229.12 (16 Dec 2011 14:34:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, Ian Price To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 16 15:34:41 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RbYrx-0002mS-9v for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:34:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37128 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbYrv-0003Z1-Td for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:34:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59383) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbYrn-0003Yf-RA for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:34:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbYrj-0000nt-CH for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:34:31 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:34602 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbYri-00008f-Qp for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:34:27 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5719791A; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:30:54 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=SODnmqb8mad0 vRPy7Ma6bRMX1hM=; b=SieYp+f+18zujMr0adSbY+BnkTUW0KIZOp5DEsLAj/b6 LKv+Lfm38l8qpL9PP6cpBc5lsLZvgJsgXKf/9QH9FYdjLH3XmVCXBp9XfSIwlpCN 83wQuz/NeZUEUvvZlfQImoMjywp9QryBYIqzD2Od2QJlRmSU024nm2ltQXoYPGo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=KzlMFJ aC5ArWJt6RieGtbNvkZC3hqA9Z68wEceF0w4Hgo5/zbB55JbZqoVMdzBQHvgYLXL 8poqmvi0EQobO8P+6TXP096K9lwliPUfjbsuEc0a9EZU1tCp8SBMmr++orhP2xYj WDqaaTIXChbD4i1oUyt8FFIoUSgn41oaFtv8k= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9727919; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:30:54 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 297AA7918; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:30:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87iplgg4b3.fsf@ambire.localdomain> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:10:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8FA244A0-27F2-11E1-86D6-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9053 Archived-At: On Fri 16 Dec 2011 12:10, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > () Ian Price > () Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:32:29 +0000 > > Andy Wingo writes: > > > It works with Guile 2.0 if you replace: > > > > #define MAKE_HASH_TABLE(size) \ > > (scm_make_vector (REASONABLE_BUCKET_COUNT (size), SCM_EOL)) > > > > with > > > > #define MAKE_HASH_TABLE(size) \ > > (scm_c_make_hash_table (size)) > > I can confirm that with this change it works. Thanks ttn for the > release, and thanks andy for saving me some debugging time :) > > OK, this is a good first and second step. Now the sticking point: > i am worried that =E2=80=98scm_c_make_hash_table=E2=80=99 is undocumented. Patches very much welcome :-) If neither of you has time, please send a mail to bug-guile@gnu.org so that we don't forget about it. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/