From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: A mess with GOOPS Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:11:58 +0100 Message-ID: <874nw494wx.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87y5y5230u.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326129148 20936 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2012 17:12:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, Daniel Llorens del =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=ADo?= To: Panicz Maciej Godek Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 09 18:12:20 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkIlf-0004zl-H4 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:12:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57688 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkIlf-0007B9-1m for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:12:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53854) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkIlW-0007Ai-0T for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:12:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkIlQ-0006Ua-BQ for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:12:09 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:38562 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkIlQ-0006US-6H for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:12:04 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CAD81BB; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:12:03 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=gthKGVN5mbylKln6w39vOSByZhw=; b=UqhsgW wO481m3rI90/xBWxnf9xprs7XpjTZsMjqLGcA93dZ5E+W+XW3sRUVyXU3dR3q42g cSGHbbtvtp4twrf/ipg8lD2n7XdHfs78EKdYsFmgqoxlosNDHSIj4sLcHpt+bAxP w4XZhno8SG0E13xdX6W27CKWvqqAkVgdzzLTc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=oinWKrGnU/8cUg38U9S7l9ezuEmlQaYL uWFOqz19u8+/wAF/9dZ4MoNKPkmcpHproeSXNfp3hjPOJwB+lE+Ao9O2MayZehLJ Y+fTjoZ12nbWIx+QHC69Gu6HWHc9Yp2/p/8cYmo+bcMwuNQGvUM/NF4yssIvamYU KMog95/PkuE= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE93981BA; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:12:03 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49FF481B8; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:12:02 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Panicz Maciej Godek's message of "Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:35:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0C408206-3AE5-11E1-9E99-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9102 Archived-At: Hi Panicz, On Mon 05 Sep 2011 23:35, Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > The thing is that is implemented as a smob, > and that there is no easy way to add a superclass > to a class created from smob. Ew. Why don't we instead allocate a typecode for arrays. I just pushed a patch to do that, and for bitvectors as well. Copying Daniel Llorens, to check that I didn't break arrays. Want to submit a new patch, Panicz? Thanks, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/