From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Hack, zile, tetris Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:36:09 +0100 Message-ID: <874nuqk7ee.fsf@pobox.com> References: <1329375443.81756.YahooMailNeo@web37901.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <87zkcizyot.fsf@gnu.org> <1329406786.24348.YahooMailNeo@web37902.mail.mud.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329413798 8774 80.91.229.3 (16 Feb 2012 17:36:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , "guile-user@gnu.org" To: Mike Gran Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 16 18:36:31 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry5Fs-0002Ix-M1 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:36:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41074 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry5Fs-0004yL-2L for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:36:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46955) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry5Fk-0004xU-Oa for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:36:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry5Fe-0002qe-IL for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:36:20 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:55591 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry5Fe-0002qa-Dy; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:36:14 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE8472ED; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:36:14 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+Lhq3ZPQ+AGkXSk5ySFirJefX6M=; b=uYyC/J Q6T4VEHSnAIu32JwyuTczGXUDnfzppgwmNpcFmnUlguSbqQx8OePpAVzVRQWPQXu s7nb6qNiipL46M9Q/bEg0rpHBhB/nRRFsIAKNKxYfPOoodxsBf6XdsLWHUINOzQf yGUeWtkwIBsLY8okJdLslcudmqENIcL1l4Wc4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=fAvUo3RCqG+V51TV2XGWh3vimDv11Y/i Krr6qPZgp3WpYQhHtqaFwTs4qLaKw9P6BndJ5PLKHmhhzdgiq3p4jSX949UG5OTL E72pBMGy2BcGRbNdTPzT4++scB23N3IYnBLquhdvdIq3XMpf9/UsrWSp2lKecZcn 1nroyUgtv/I= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2930F72EC; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:36:14 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7917472EB; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:36:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1329406786.24348.YahooMailNeo@web37902.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Mike Gran's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:39:46 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B8E2549C-58C4-11E1-A23F-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9280 Archived-At: On Thu 16 Feb 2012 16:39, Mike Gran writes: > I should have know that using (times) wasn't very portable. > I'll have to redo it with srfi-18 time to be more formal. Or use internal-time-units-per-second, or get-internal-run-time, or something like that? Andy -- http://wingolog.org/