From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [ANN] Guile Hall 0.3.0 released Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 10:27:20 +0200 Message-ID: <874krz5eon.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k11bdh0k.fsf@gmail.com> <874ksfd2d0.fsf@gmail.com> <877dxaefr8.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2pqcmox.fsf@gmail.com> <79722626938f0660f261154a697ccd16198744e3.camel@gmail.com> <87pnatc9jo.fsf@gmail.com> <87k10xhzhj.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnaockak.fsf@gnu.org> <87d06oawcn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="9475"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: Guile User To: Catonano Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 29 10:27:39 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jeaMc-0002Ln-Ks for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 10:27:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43114 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jeaMb-000405-G3 for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 04:27:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60712) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jeaMM-0003zy-St for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 04:27:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jeaMM-0004BO-K1; Fri, 29 May 2020 04:27:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=41860 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jeaMM-00018s-0b; Fri, 29 May 2020 04:27:22 -0400 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 11 Prairial an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (catonano@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 28 May 2020 19:26:42 +0200") X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:16526 Archived-At: Hi Catonano, Catonano skribis: > Il giorno gio 28 mag 2020 alle ore 17:54 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s ha > scritto: > >> Hi, >> >> Catonano skribis: >> >> >> What do you think should be added or reworded? I=E2=80=99m happy to = fix it. >> >> >> > >> > It's here ! >> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2020-05/msg00026.html >> >> Thank you. It=E2=80=99s more concise than what I committed. >> >> What=E2=80=99s your suggestion exactly? Do you think the version in mas= ter is >> too verbose? >> > > I explained my reasons to Alex and he agreed with them > > You can read my reasons here > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2020-05/msg00094.html > > As for what I'm suggesting: I'm suggesting to create a new commit in which > you scrap the current text and you paste our version I=E2=80=99m sorry, I won=E2=80=99t do that. The arguments in the message y= ou reference above are not compelling to me; I fail to see what=E2=80=99s wrong with the current text. Apologies for not following the discussion closely enough. I=E2=80=99m personally willing to move on now, but really, I think the outcome is good. Thanks again for pushing this change! Ludo=E2=80=99.