From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ricardo Wurmus Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.lisp.guile.sources Subject: Re: RPX 1.3 available Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 10:57:41 +0100 Message-ID: <874kk6mewa.fsf@elephly.net> References: <877dqwid5n.fsf@gnuvola.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32725"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, guile-sources@gnu.org To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 28 10:58:07 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ktpHy-0008Pf-Ht for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 10:58:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34884 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktpHx-0003vm-Di for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 04:58:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45198) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktpHm-0003vc-DO; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 04:57:54 -0500 Original-Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktpHk-000296-HH; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 04:57:54 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609149468; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=YWBgb700MvJIPcZe5iFOG6hSxqwHZkLLEehOxkx1M5hvO/X+bmDBAZcSPahGRWk/w654rcJ1jcqUbq/8SqIlefumFoscEkof37gL4QcjjATcwUzyWyls9VB8ULRhQ1ml6nzXfv+IK8qGdAphXX1aojIHwt2e7JEyT99z6TIyOFA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1609149468; h=Content-Type:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=3LZnbmql1kjvfSrNNtLjNDWjRGQja+FPmHoQ/G1Im2Q=; b=l9S3gA00vwazcoRpjYs7XdsiRihp47eigxl0AFgTrMyZpnjD8iI3dXmLqAAJXkSmzNOW6qKXVPJ0To5Xmtq+TZo0BUDCiXkIj39VkpKyYZDjEQX+o7WZFnpSOL4t7VBhzFddM2/GHIK7bSfNmJEAC5K5ekR2kfEkKu0HpHgaefU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1609149468; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=3LZnbmql1kjvfSrNNtLjNDWjRGQja+FPmHoQ/G1Im2Q=; b=ZW5+uVsIHyIZNw13CWngMEj+kNXMtRBS/rZdLvH/BdK18FPP1hwBK2462VyKmPAp TFEMo8L9PrSC09IgUpAnDH5CGSc1xMN5NCzsDb1ITEy0zHaKRw4Ge5H2pL5QGdJoIvM mEvbz+EWgsozqOsZgx5cPuJAWeNdpearCLY/GAQI= Original-Received: from localhost (p54ad4f7c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.79.124]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1609149464592840.4795436151431; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 01:57:44 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: <877dqwid5n.fsf@gnuvola.org> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.51; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net; helo=sender4-of-o51.zoho.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:17129 gmane.lisp.guile.sources:567 Archived-At: Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > Despite rpx veneration of ratpoison look, feel, and > internal design, there have been some unavoidable > concessions to some of the more hairy parts of Xlib (the > reimplementation of which is shared somewhat uneasily by > rpx and ttn-do). These are listed in the manual. Are you aware of Guile XCB? Perhaps it could be used to avoid having to reimplement Xlib features. -- Ricardo