unofficial mirror of guile-user@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:45:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8737b41rfy.fsf@netris.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h8zk1v3v.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:26:12 -0400")

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:

> The reason that (f) is not in tail position with respect to (list (f))
> is because there is still something left to do after calling (f) but
> before invoking the continuation of (list (f)).  The thing remaining to
> do is to apply 'list' to the returned value.
>
> Putting it another way, if (f) evaluates to 5, you cannot proceed by
> reducing (list (f)) to 5.  The continuation of (f) cannot be the same as
> the continuation of (list (f)), because that would skip the step of
> calling 'list'.

FYI, the precise rules for what it means to be in "tail position" are
given in R6RS section 11.20 and R7RS section 3.5.  In those documents,
they call the same concept "tail context".  See:

  http://www.r6rs.org/final/html/r6rs/r6rs-Z-H-14.html#node_sec_11.20

       Mark



  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-13  3:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-11  7:56 Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure Chris Marusich
2017-06-11  8:28 ` David Kastrup
2017-06-11 20:36 ` Mark H Weaver
2017-06-11 21:31   ` Mark H Weaver
2017-06-12  0:19   ` Chris Marusich
2017-06-12  4:25     ` Mark H Weaver
2017-06-12  8:19       ` Chris Marusich
2017-06-12  8:55         ` Neil Jerram
2017-06-12  9:48           ` Neil Jerram
2017-06-12  9:39         ` David Kastrup
2017-06-12 11:31           ` Mark H Weaver
2017-06-12 14:24             ` David Kastrup
2017-06-13  2:26               ` Mark H Weaver
2017-06-13  3:09                 ` Mark H Weaver
2017-06-13  3:45                 ` Mark H Weaver [this message]
2017-06-13 11:17                 ` dsmich
2017-06-26 11:25                   ` Alex Vong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-09-01 19:39 Chris Marusich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8737b41rfy.fsf@netris.org \
    --to=mhw@netris.org \
    --cc=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).