From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Managing Guile and extensions versions Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 23:07:07 +0100 Message-ID: <871x369pmc.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <6efab235050925145055ba774c@mail.gmail.com> <873bns2f26.fsf@laas.fr> <6efab2350509261220665afe20@mail.gmail.com> <87br2ezyth.fsf@laas.fr> <6efab235050927035441b39b85@mail.gmail.com> <874q86qzuk.fsf@laas.fr> <6efab235050927101826b2da7d@mail.gmail.com> <87d5mtis5l.fsf_-_@laas.fr> <6efab235050928131950e30e8c@mail.gmail.com> <871x3728he.fsf@laas.fr> <6efab23505092909302c336ac0@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1128118370 1672 80.91.229.2 (30 Sep 2005 22:12:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 01 00:12:47 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELT78-0005fy-6F for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 00:12:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELT77-0003dN-89 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:12:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ELT5O-0002ey-B0 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:10:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ELT5K-0002db-9v for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:10:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELT5K-0002d7-2c for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:10:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ELT58-0006p5-RY for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:10:19 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns (host81-139-70-226.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.139.70.226]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7D9409FBE; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AA96F71C; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 23:07:08 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Vorfeed Canal In-Reply-To: <6efab23505092909302c336ac0@mail.gmail.com> (Vorfeed Canal's message of "Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:30:03 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4803 Archived-At: Vorfeed Canal writes: > On 9/29/05, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > >> So, I'm all in favor of having your patch (or something equivalent) >> applied. I guess you'll need to /kindly/ ask the developers for further >> reviewing and see what needs to be done so that it can actually be >> applied. >> > Where are how should I do this ? I was under impression that this list > is exactly where such changes must be discussed. The two developers who have thought most on this subject in the past are Marius (Vollmer) and Rob (Browning), and they've both been out of circulation for the last week or so. No doubt one of them will respond when they catch up with the list. Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user