From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: William Xu Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: about readline Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 19:19:19 +0800 Organization: the Church of Emacs Message-ID: <871wx7ap1k.fsf@www.williamxu.com> References: <87d5gt9ghz.fsf@www.williamxu.com> <878xrhrpa1.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <878xrh9edv.fsf@www.williamxu.com> <871wx8sylv.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142162322 6623 80.91.229.2 (12 Mar 2006 11:18:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 12 12:18:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FIOag-00024B-UF for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 12:18:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FIOag-0007r0-5l for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 06:18:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FIOab-0007pD-AD for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 06:18:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FIOaZ-0007n8-M6 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 06:18:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FIOaZ-0007n3-ID for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 06:18:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [59.66.131.181] (helo=localhost) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FIOeI-0003FN-K4 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 06:22:10 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=www.williamxu.com) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FIObc-0003Vg-00 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 19:19:25 +0800 Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <871wx8sylv.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sat, 11 Mar 2006 17:03:08 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:5226 Archived-At: Neil Jerram writes: > William Xu writes: > >> While this is a function? It seems the very variable is >> *readline-completion-function*, but which is not exported from the >> module? > > Yes. I guess the point is to protect the normal value of > *readline-completion-function* from being permanently lost. Is this > interface a problem in practice for you? Hmm, not really. I think i'm okay with it at present. >> Also, i have no clue how to contruct a proper `completer' for >> with-readline-completion-function. The docstring is too simple... > > It is a bit odd, but basically follows the corresponding C interface. > Here's an example which worked some time ago for me. (I haven't > tested it recently.) > [...] That works. Thanks. And i thought maybe this function can be included in readline module. It is very useful. -- William _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user