From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Christopher Lemmer Webber Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [ANN] Guile Hall 0.3.0 released Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 12:36:36 -0400 Message-ID: <871rniseln.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <87k11bdh0k.fsf@gmail.com> <874ksfd2d0.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="105242"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 17 18:36:52 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jaMHT-000RI1-Nx for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 18:36:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49242 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaMHS-00013o-Nt for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 12:36:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55452) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaMHH-00012S-UU for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 12:36:39 -0400 Original-Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:47934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaMHG-00022j-Sn; Sun, 17 May 2020 12:36:39 -0400 Original-Received: from twig (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 781712671A; Sun, 17 May 2020 12:36:36 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=50.116.34.160; envelope-from=cwebber@dustycloud.org; helo=dustycloud.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/17 12:36:36 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:16478 Archived-At: Catonano writes: > Now, I like to remind that Ludo had proposed to _mention_ guile-hall in the > guix.texi manual !! > > Here: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2018-07/msg00002.html > > "I think we should advertise it widely" > > I wholeheartedly agree > > This is an important step in making the Guile user experience less rough > > Where, in the manual, should such mention be placed ? The comparative frustration I had with having to use autotools for simple guile projects vs when I was developing in Racket was one of the things that came up in my FOSDEM talk last year. I didn't know that in my absence Guile Hall came to be, though people told me later. I'm excited that Guile Hall has reduced this overhead considerably, so I agree with all the above. That's all to say, thank you Alex for working on one of the most important problems in Guile! This is great!