From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Guile foreign object interface Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 17:47:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83wpbyfo5g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1644439317.409814.1488469678720.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1644439317.409814.1488469678720@mail.yahoo.com> <87shmpcibe.fsf@gnu.org> <87r32988we.fsf@pobox.com> <877f40svma.fsf@gnu.org> <87r32867ni.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87lgsfjxhi.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9xb4bmn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87y3webqij.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489074488 19045 195.159.176.226 (9 Mar 2017 15:48:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 15:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 09 16:48:04 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cm0IJ-0003h7-Pi for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:47:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34826 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cm0IM-0005cP-Ql for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46726) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cm0Hw-0005c7-3Y for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:47:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cm0Hv-0000xQ-5f for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:47:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49259) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cm0Hp-0000pU-Ub; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:47:29 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2225 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cm0Hp-0000ra-5J; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:47:29 -0500 In-reply-to: <87y3webqij.fsf@gnu.org> (ludo@gnu.org) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13460 Archived-At: > From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:09:40 +0100 > > >> As an aside, please keep the tone friendly as is the norm on this > >> mailing list. > > > > Disagreement is not the same as unfriendliness. > > I agree. However I found the tone of your messages patronizing and > aggressive, assuming bad faith and incompetence on the side of the Guile > developers (“planning for wreckage”, “pretty pointless”, etc. etc.) FYI, I've communicated (and occasionally disagreed) with David for many years, and I can assure you that you see something that simply isn't there. He sometimes uses such "colorful" descriptions to make a point more clear, that's all. People should be allowed to use their personal style when writing, without being reprimanded, IMO.