From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:47:18 +0300 Message-ID: <83li3phdcp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83vc2wj4hz.fsf@gnu.org> <83li3siues.fsf@gnu.org> <838uzrioqr.fsf@gnu.org> <83mwo5hjut.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjs5aeps.fsf@tines.lan> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1377452846 16469 80.91.229.3 (25 Aug 2013 17:47:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 17:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 25 19:47:29 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VDePQ-0000BN-MS for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:47:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47051 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VDePQ-0001VC-Bb for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 13:47:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VDePD-0001UG-Ow for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 13:47:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VDeP8-0008PK-Fb for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 13:47:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:42674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VDeP8-0008OE-7c for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 13:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MS300300LAOZ900@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:47:08 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MS3003UWLEKOT60@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:47:08 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87zjs5aeps.fsf@tines.lan> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10695 Archived-At: > From: Mark H Weaver > Cc: Panicz Maciej Godek , guile-user@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:59:43 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I guess you didn't configure without threads on GNU/Linux, did you? > > If not, I suggest to try that, my impression is that Guile without > > threads is not used too much on Posix platforms. > > Hydra, a continuous integration system, runs Guile's "make check" with > threads disabled on several POSIX platforms, so there's no need for > Panicz to do this test. Sorry, I disagree. "make check" is not the issue here: Guile passes it on my machine with flying colors (see my reports back then). And yet a simple program shown by Panicz aborts due to "stack overflow". I was suggesting to configure Guile on GNU/Linux without threads and run that same program: perhaps it will also fail.