From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile+iconv fails on windows Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 19:15:37 +0200 Message-ID: <8338n441qe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837gcg534b.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384103780 1212 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2013 17:16:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Panicz Maciej Godek Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 10 18:16:24 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VfYca-00020Q-0V for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 18:16:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32852 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfYcZ-0002Up-DD for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:16:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfYcM-0002Uf-Ad for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:16:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfYcG-0000PA-Cc for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:16:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:33792) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfYcG-0000P4-4U for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:16:04 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MW200G0057A5400@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 19:15:45 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MW200GXW5A95200@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 19:15:45 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10880 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 10:16:51 +0100 > From: Panicz Maciej Godek > Cc: "guile-user@gnu.org" > > The dependency walker shows that libiconv depends only on dlls supplied > by Windows (kernel32.dll, msvcrt.dll and ntdll.dll). The dependency on > libgcc appears only in libguile, but it seems to have nothing to do with > iconv. Rebuilding libiconv didn't change anything Then I guess you will have to run that compilation under GDB and see why it thinks utf8 is invalid encoding. (Is it really "utf8" or "utf-8" or maybe "UTF-8"?) > (I believe that since those are dlls and libguile plainly depends on > libiconv-2.dll, there should be no need to rebuild guile > afterwards?) If you rebuilt libiconv-2.dll, you shouldn't need to rebuild guile.