From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "dskr@mac.com" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: My Project: Guile Hypertext Preprocessor Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:44:45 -0400 Message-ID: <7228B261-C474-4E34-8301-246D0AEA8CB3@mac.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281642298 23287 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2010 19:44:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Mailing List To: Luiji Maryo Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 12 21:44:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ojdhv-0006Nu-23 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:44:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42996 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ojdhu-0003AY-H3 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:44:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58988 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ojdhp-00039x-3l for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:44:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ojdhn-0002G7-Hl for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:44:48 -0400 Original-Received: from asmtpout025.mac.com ([17.148.16.100]:41494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ojdhn-0002Fs-DF for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:44:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.0.1.3] ([69.17.66.128]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L7200DCC1ID6G40@asmtp025.mac.com> for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:44:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1008120170 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-08-12_10:2010-08-12, 2010-08-12, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 In-reply-to: X-Mailer: iPad Mail (7B405) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8061 Archived-At: Guile is not its REPL. Look at '-s', '-e'. With that resolved, I wonder whether there are still useful HTML pages where the static template is large compared to the language fragment. PHP is a product of its time. Cheers, Dan On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Luiji Maryo wrote: > Hm...I've just realized a few problems with how I've structured this. > > For one thing, the Guile and Perl interpreters would not be able to evaluate just one section of code at a time, because:: > - Guile would output "guile> " every line, which would appear in the ...