From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vorfeed Canal Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: PHP to GUILE Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:47:26 +0400 Message-ID: <6efab235050927104711f7add@mail.gmail.com> References: <6efab235050925145055ba774c@mail.gmail.com> <6efab235050926004326d03d6a@mail.gmail.com> <6efab23505092609331abd82b7@mail.gmail.com> <6efab2350509260934639fcc59@mail.gmail.com> <6efab235050927031160fe348a@mail.gmail.com> <6efab23505092707369aa72e5@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Vorfeed Canal NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1127843510 27279 80.91.229.2 (27 Sep 2005 17:51:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 27 19:51:43 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EKJZH-0007wH-C3 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:48:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EKJZG-0001OM-JJ for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:48:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EKJZ3-0001L8-8D for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:48:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EKJZ0-0001K0-HQ for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:48:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EKJZ0-0001Ji-D2 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:48:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [72.14.204.200] (helo=qproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EKJY8-0001tR-3Q for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:47:28 -0400 Original-Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id e14so317868qbc for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:47:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OU9NN8Skjka5KssKErWmJQt0MGwNn0QmyGJbYr5iKUEzDZ6oRn2Df7dMELgSESdzh1/K8oWjhZ10ZzuczTxvPh4p1gQg6K9WyDNsuYiNoBHorVcy3uVlyk/QQI0u9W1dEchurbcISx35dVEryg2fOfQLh88yBmJBiDzhTgHu4IU= Original-Received: by 10.65.96.3 with SMTP id y3mr138276qbl; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.65.100.16 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4794 Archived-At: On 9/27/05, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: > > compiling scheme to native is part of the original vision. i don't know > what "scheduled" means, but i know that i'm personally interested in it > and that it is not out of my reach technically. on the other hand, i'm > never sure about other people. > Scheduled =3D=3D we have this person who'll do coding after he'll do this o= r that. > It violates KISS and IMHO this is bigger problem."Keep solution as > simple as possible, but not simpler". > > that is a nice way to think about things in the abstract. i suppose if > the system exists and it works in practice, that is another nice way to > look at it. > Ok, I still think this message-catalogs idea is needlessly complex, but we can agree to disagree on that issue. > i don't really know what "first" you are referring to here, but the code > is similar to the QUICK-START script from the Guile-SDL distribution dir. > you can try that out to see how things go. > Cite: "Keep solution as simple as possible, but not simpler" The first part is first part: "keep you solution as simple as possible". I think that your solution is too complex for today's needs and not complex enough to tomorrows. But I'd be happy to have it in official GUILE as well. I want *any* working solution there. Right now you can ask GUILE about pkglibdir or libdir and it'll answer : -- $ /somewhere/there/bin/guile-config info pkglibdir /somewhere/there/lib/guile $ /somewhere/there/bin/guile-config info libdir /somewhere/there/lib -- But it does not matter if you'll put your library in $pkglibdir or $libdir - unless it's "/lib" or "/usr/lib" it'll not be found. This is not acceptable IMNSHO. *Any* other WORKING solution is better then non-working one. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user