Re: Nyacc question: where are the actions bound?

[Matt Wette <matt.wette@gmail.com>]

On 8/3/20 1:42 PM, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 06:50:08AM -0700, Matt Wette wrote:
>> On 3/8/20 3:14 AM, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm playing around with Nyacc: I found a first little use case
> [...]
>
>>> So I defined some function =collect= which will be called from
>>> actions in the grammar.
>>>
>>> My question is: where is the stuff resolved which is mentioned
>>> in grammar actions?
> [...]
>
>> Hi Tomas, (I apologize for the ascii spelling)
>> You may be able to do what you want with the following:
>>
>> (define (parse)
>>   (let ((raw-parser (make-lalr-parser)))
>>     (raw-parser (gen-lexer))))
> OK, got it now. It doesn't actually address my problem above, but
> you answered my question above anyway, and even made the environment
> more flexible (that was the commit:
>
>    commit 9f45ea29bfc22e53cf08c27a6fb9d2de581b2092
>    Author: Matt Wette <mwette@alumni.caltech.edu>
>    Date:   Mon Mar 23 17:38:30 2020 -0700
>
>        Author: Matt Wette
>        Date:   Mar 23, 2020
>      
>                Add #:env option to specify module for evaluating parser actions
>                * module/nyacc/parse.scm (make-lalr-parser): add #env
>                  (make-lalr-parser/num , /sym) use (current-module) as default
>                * test-suite/nyacc/lalr-01.test: add test case
>
> so thanks a lot for that). I'm a happy camper :)
>
> Cheers
>   - t
Good to hear!  Thanks for the feedback.
Matt