From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Dumb Licensing Questions Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 09:17:50 +0100 Message-ID: <665c83e5-733c-2210-d3c5-ae7ba2767197@pelzflorian.de> References: <1481769661.14047.38.camel@members.fsf.org> <87vaulxaq7.fsf@web.de> <92993b98-1da1-1bcc-ecb4-01deede37183@pelzflorian.de> <20161224080340.GB30358@tuxteam.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1482567501 10238 195.159.176.226 (24 Dec 2016 08:18:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 08:18:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.5.1 To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 24 09:18:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cKhWu-0001fK-PT for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 09:18:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42648 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKhWz-0002R7-5h for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:18:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKhWf-0002R2-3G for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:17:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKhWb-0002UZ-Md for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:17:57 -0500 Original-Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:33632 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKhWb-0002UG-C1 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:17:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.21] (ip5f58bf63.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.88.191.99]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 770FF360003 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 09:17:51 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1482567471; bh=+V9rxSDFTcu+rwx7/TYiAD10Li6/HVa2sB02FzZwntY=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=i53tokhoFd+Sx7PZIVcgxswiWbT10IF3p6DgzFc9/qSyh/DcbR69p/2UkEmRFdxk3 LRIcQB5Rnj5SlA1VT1iXz5Yvmzt3s3qgbfbqkMjhCpUQ2uFMqhrCFcGY+j/GbmXy0x 1LwYZNK4HVlTwZ8V9j7fzR9+4SVYZetY4kWIBPac= In-Reply-To: <20161224080340.GB30358@tuxteam.de> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 5.45.111.108 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13047 Archived-At: On 12/24/2016 09:03 AM, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > That's probably because YANAL. >=20 > (sorry, couldn't resist). >=20 > It's clear that there are different standpoints. The linking thing (dyn= amic > or static) hasn't, AFAIK, tested in court. It's quite possible that dif= ferent > courts reach different conclusions (in the same or different places in = the > world). It's even possible (gasp!) that the legal interpretations of th= ings > change over time. >=20 > If I were you, I'd just comply with what the FSF proposes, and that is = pretty > clear [1]. Any reasons not to comply with that? >=20 > Sorry if this sounds a bit grumpy. >=20 > regards > -- tom=C3=A1s >=20 Sorry, I just wanted to call attention to other opinions. Following the FSF is the safe and sane choice. Regards, Florian