From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Neil Jerram" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Killing off scm_init_guile for Guile 2.0 ? Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:48:15 +0000 Message-ID: <49dd78620901151548n60b11c7dy335eb3a2702f5e23@mail.gmail.com> References: <49dd78620901151530o66a2641ax47e526d15fc09faf@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232063314 19089 80.91.229.12 (15 Jan 2009 23:48:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:48:34 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel , "Guile User" Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 16 00:49:46 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LNby3-0000Zr-J3 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:49:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58953 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LNbwn-0001aH-A6 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:48:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LNbwi-0001Zo-LE for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:48:20 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LNbwg-0001Yu-0T for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:48:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44389 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LNbwf-0001Yn-Ue; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:48:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f14.google.com ([209.85.218.14]:37706) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LNbwf-0003P1-By; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:48:17 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so901759bwz.18 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:48:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=VtW2usS4Yjg+o5huClGyb7hsPvkLP3Ms2n5r8s+F/Zc=; b=DTFaroen9RwrykiJjuyGW67aBW1bGW75yqixHg45rCdbVDwWaueTNKcSq3qAyWa0CP RnMnT3a2fBfNE0aTgn7BlPwiemyhcU0SiEOP7TTJsAVYqWCvpuJcSvH5WH/Wv/wPjT7Q PvkojYIwpZborvx960Zwna0l4Nj/UgGBwNcTo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=JCBtJoIvvKC13UIRq/Oa1Vtx893d0cW4zaif5vg0xaxw/hZi6Vc6os2hdWk3X7n+Hc 53i4FfUu6R/vd+iACZJOdYqMd6EjTLLBT2yfVafGmPQ86Sj4nXDGx1HL4QlwuCTN3M5K iskAK9mcrEIKx6MupPUPWSG+IK8WoXq5jawec= Original-Received: by 10.181.31.16 with SMTP id i16mr610074bkj.129.1232063295507; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:48:15 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.181.208.17 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:48:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49dd78620901151530o66a2641ax47e526d15fc09faf@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7058 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8037 Archived-At: 2009/1/15 Neil Jerram : > > Thoughts? On the other hand, does moving to BDW-GC take a lot of this > out of our hands anyway? >From a quick look, it seems the answer to that is "yes", and hence moving to BDW-GC will mean that we can keep scm_init_guile with no cost. So this is probably all moot... but it would still be interesting to hear if anyone has related thoughts. Neil