From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Neil Jerram" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.lisp.guile.gtk Subject: Re: Just in case... Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:39:30 +0100 Message-ID: <49dd78620808040339xacc8e1dm344af6a93350fbc8@mail.gmail.com> References: <87wsjgnvp3.fsf@gnu.org> <49dd78620807250305i2704c8aej92190a88a006c744@mail.gmail.com> <4889EFE6.3000409@wilsonjc.us> <49dd78620807280231g3ab15246l2cb9fd49025dcfa7@mail.gmail.com> <49dd78620807290108p63704f96v7f0efc139be66112@mail.gmail.com> <87sktsi4tf.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> <877ib1mfdu.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217846402 3781 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2008 10:40:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Users , guile-gtk discussions To: "Rob Browning" Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 04 12:40:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KPxUg-0000ZP-Av for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:40:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44925 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KPxTk-0007DC-AE for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:39:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KPxTc-00077B-7r for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:39:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KPxTZ-00072m-Fq for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:39:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44805 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KPxTZ-00072H-0s for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:39:41 -0400 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]:41241) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KPxTX-0001FX-L8 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:39:40 -0400 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m34so1382017wag.10 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 03:39:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=2FLA+xVU4zkw65gDcwkreHNuASImZVOVS1HszsoIfmY=; b=rsnDXEHk4dJMfx0IyAluovHnO4NoAxQc0zZ3cF7ee7tXlpPhiMXzoRwlnWtDcxCQH4 rZNrFwHBzQeoypPKKX++t4n0IwAzdw/iXv0DIU2mtrRVDPtg4BOwuXkkkALeMwgmp5B0 pBMr8UpCR387Yi06akQWXCqq2pu88lKg8r/RI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Zrqgw0GUAIB3baR9EEdzraMYy+zEPlFDU8N7+4jr+aHIevCe9UsurYXHsWu+TsFGSV 6Yh9zA+iOLQf9kaVD4ri3lJ89qIz3XzWqJK+DpBrsY7NTxEjn/8elhwXfFF2NN+QRPcs 2OVfw3eGANwaW2O08PE6oTlol1NIzgaySYo1Q= Original-Received: by 10.114.137.2 with SMTP id k2mr14412864wad.95.1217846370601; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 03:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.197.8 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 03:39:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877ib1mfdu.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:6725 gmane.lisp.guile.gtk:807 Archived-At: 2008/8/1 Rob Browning : > > OK, I should be uploading packages that include Neil's two patches > this weekend, if not sooner. Many thanks for handling this, Rob. Looking now at the logs at http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=guile-1.8, it seems that: amd64, arm, armel, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390: are all good hppa: is still getting the broken pipe / seg fault when building guile-procedures.texi ia64: is getting illegal instruction in test-unwind i386, m68k, sparc: are unclickable, so I can't tell The ia64 one is fully understood; you just need to add http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=commit;h=78aa4a8850396801f2e5515565d051b45b4f15b5 The hppa symptom is the same as (mips, mipsel, powerpc) were seeing before the latest patches. What kind of architecture is hppa? Is there any chance that the patches somehow didn't take for that arch? Out of interest, what is the difference between Building and Built statuses? Regards, Neil