From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Neil Jerram" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: What happened to the infix module? Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:10:57 +0100 Message-ID: <49dd78620808021010o5cc661b9i860eba83095fe514@mail.gmail.com> References: <87myjvio0u.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217697094 12165 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2008 17:11:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: "Maciek Godek" Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 02 19:12:24 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KPKeW-0004qn-0z for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:12:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55120 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KPKdb-00052k-1W for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:11:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KPKdC-0004VE-ES for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KPKdA-0004St-If for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:11:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37893 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KPKdA-0004Sd-6s for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:11:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.246]:41934) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KPKd9-0007YW-Qu for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:11:00 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so1536095rvb.6 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:10:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=lT/hJFCLxyUXlUhulXmWSYXipZ/p6S1nZXl4QKC4AOw=; b=ds5Qsg+A7YvtOrUYf13xYn3KhZV4qUUvBTFEj3NWQHRUdbrBDmYLPtAhwILp22OvD1 7sW/4BPEQcHUbr0VsPWvvT1npEcxYJvUqpXVSX0902B2ypk82msvi7vVwfAytHzSvumM rIwwokq7QK6K89t4zCYGAWHTjT5YVA1rKNItM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=c3UuO+UnS2w2aiUepl9B9UIKOeJ3TJM/wM/2dbfn0K9Lvp9MZMZ5t85DvnjVyuGd4X xVEAvHfNeTYNjaK7ZMJbxrFm7tqj9Kcy3tNjXeDeSX8QgYbFCULAHYvNipuCBaCG5KDi HXk/omofbQh+LkD/HSpY+IY0lAeY12qVuqODE= Original-Received: by 10.114.38.2 with SMTP id l2mr12935621wal.200.1217697058010; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:10:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.197.8 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 10:10:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:6721 Archived-At: 2008/8/2 Maciek Godek : > > Oh, I finally have my chance to ask: > why was the guile 1.4 fork created? There was an argument in about May 2005 between Thien-Thi and the maintainer at the time (Marius Vollmer). It began technically, but became a bit unpleasant, and Marius felt that he had to revoke Thien-Thi's ability to commit to the Guile CVS repository. And so on, from there... Neil