From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Neil Jerram" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: scheme -> (X)HTML Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:32:40 +0100 Message-ID: <49dd78620807031532xb870094n23ef8cc457142fb6@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080325193702.6B6AE94049@webmail220.herald.ox.ac.uk> <2bc5f8210803251253p6f07911brcceaa1cc2bf949c1@mail.gmail.com> <87bq521qu6.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <3anht5tp.fsf@vps203.linuxvps.org> <49dd78620806161415u4be464a9g410073b55b581b51@mail.gmail.com> <87od5vf8yq.fsf@moley.moleskin.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1215124374 12257 80.91.229.12 (3 Jul 2008 22:32:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 22:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: "Sebastian Tennant" Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 04 00:33:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KEXMx-0000lv-7f for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:33:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36287 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KEXM6-0002fe-Hu for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:32:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KEXM3-0002f0-Og for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:32:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KEXM2-0002du-57 for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:32:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38809 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KEXM2-0002dr-0w for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:32:42 -0400 Original-Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.178]:33886) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KEXM1-00068w-OQ for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:32:41 -0400 Original-Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so634042pyb.1 for ; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:32:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Yn06Te07zmSOd3PWlUUYKS8yTJEIV+9LrDJN+tbvNvw=; b=R1oKFs38MlDyXyo8UJEZm9g/SkYd+7Gtcy6QGY0zNP6iGSN/iHJzyAftxcyNAXa1hs P26/lgB8YSCOnBpFlq3s8QEj0qj3sgA+BVz7s8SWJnaaaZV1EcQsP8a+AQspMfaD1uh+ Rku9g+ISSgzE83FR61QP7XvxEHK53oVOJUwLU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=vFT68DCoW9HVWNyL4F36kEat9mcUbiWdb9fkUnF9Of6vfcE/cWbHZ6LdygTKSGckG1 ZqD4aXJugI1w2F/hZ7bRcBalzzfYy264Bv394ofFhQL2xSWOOfzt2/rf24u+SKnOzbZX uHoCjXsQEAlsm6eQqjkkOR9KN6fQw2YlQxaBY= Original-Received: by 10.115.77.1 with SMTP id e1mr1836217wal.58.1215124360365; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:32:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.197.7 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:32:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87od5vf8yq.fsf@moley.moleskin.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:6624 Archived-At: 2008/6/21 Sebastian Tennant : > > Out of pure curiosity, whats the significance of '31' in the make-module > call in process-template? I believe it's the initial size of the module's hash table for storing bindings (from identifiers to variable locations). (I believe that prime numbers are good sizes for hash tables.) Neil