unofficial mirror of guile-user@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bertalan Fodor <lilypondtool@organum.hu>
To: linasvepstas@gmail.com
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: 1+ is not R5RS
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:41:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <494B5019.9010707@organum.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ae3aa420812182209m7a5b9905h9c06fe440c0cdcf@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1197 bytes --]

Thank you for your suggestion. I was thinking for a long time about 
these, and still I'm not convinced (by myself :-)) to use these 
projects. The little pecularities of these I think would make the effort 
as hard as creating a new one. Sisc's implementation was extremely 
complicated for my simple mind, so I'm using JScheme for some ideas.
Also I wanted to learn by doing - I think this argument in itself is 
enough :-)

Cheers,

Bert

Linas Vepstas írta:
> 2008/12/18 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <lilypondtool@organum.hu>:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to implement a more or less Guile compatible Scheme
>> implementation in Java.
>>     
>
> Well, someone mentioned kawa.
> http://www.gnu.org/software/kawa/
>
> There's also jscheme, right?
> http://www.norvig.com/jscheme.html
>
> SISC, which I think claims r5rs compliance:
> http://sisc-scheme.org/
>
> SIXX -- half-baked, but hey ...
> http://dgym.homeunix.net/mediawiki/index.php?title=Sixx
>
> I remember feeling wowed by  the description of 'clojure'
> http://clojure.org/
>
> It would make a lot more sense to contribute to an
> existing project of this nature, than to invent something
> completely new ...
>
> --linas
>
>   


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2094 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-19  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-18 15:17 1+ is not R5RS Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
2008-12-18 21:09 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-12-18 22:31   ` Clinton Ebadi
2008-12-19  4:24     ` Keith Wright
2008-12-19  9:43   ` Ralf Mattes
2008-12-19  6:09 ` Linas Vepstas
2008-12-19  7:41   ` Bertalan Fodor [this message]
2008-12-19 16:34     ` Linas Vepstas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-19 19:29 Bertalan Fodor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=494B5019.9010707@organum.hu \
    --to=lilypondtool@organum.hu \
    --cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
    --cc=linasvepstas@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).