From: Bertalan Fodor <lilypondtool@organum.hu>
To: linasvepstas@gmail.com
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: 1+ is not R5RS
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:41:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <494B5019.9010707@organum.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ae3aa420812182209m7a5b9905h9c06fe440c0cdcf@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1197 bytes --]
Thank you for your suggestion. I was thinking for a long time about
these, and still I'm not convinced (by myself :-)) to use these
projects. The little pecularities of these I think would make the effort
as hard as creating a new one. Sisc's implementation was extremely
complicated for my simple mind, so I'm using JScheme for some ideas.
Also I wanted to learn by doing - I think this argument in itself is
enough :-)
Cheers,
Bert
Linas Vepstas írta:
> 2008/12/18 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <lilypondtool@organum.hu>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to implement a more or less Guile compatible Scheme
>> implementation in Java.
>>
>
> Well, someone mentioned kawa.
> http://www.gnu.org/software/kawa/
>
> There's also jscheme, right?
> http://www.norvig.com/jscheme.html
>
> SISC, which I think claims r5rs compliance:
> http://sisc-scheme.org/
>
> SIXX -- half-baked, but hey ...
> http://dgym.homeunix.net/mediawiki/index.php?title=Sixx
>
> I remember feeling wowed by the description of 'clojure'
> http://clojure.org/
>
> It would make a lot more sense to contribute to an
> existing project of this nature, than to invent something
> completely new ...
>
> --linas
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2094 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-19 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-18 15:17 1+ is not R5RS Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
2008-12-18 21:09 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-12-18 22:31 ` Clinton Ebadi
2008-12-19 4:24 ` Keith Wright
2008-12-19 9:43 ` Ralf Mattes
2008-12-19 6:09 ` Linas Vepstas
2008-12-19 7:41 ` Bertalan Fodor [this message]
2008-12-19 16:34 ` Linas Vepstas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-19 19:29 Bertalan Fodor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=494B5019.9010707@organum.hu \
--to=lilypondtool@organum.hu \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
--cc=linasvepstas@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).