From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Threads and asyncs Date: 02 Sep 2002 18:13:52 -0700 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <43177.6471123614$1031015518@news.gmane.org> References: <87it1oglmq.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <200209022324.QAA08246@morrowfield.regexps.com> <200209022336.QAA08304@morrowfield.regexps.com> <0209021852361X.19624@locke.free-expression.org> <200209030057.RAA08617@morrowfield.regexps.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031015518 18163 127.0.0.1 (3 Sep 2002 01:11:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 01:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: owinebar@free-expression.org, rlb@defaultvalue.org, guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17m2EX-0004ip-00 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 03:11:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17m2G3-00013I-00; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 21:13:31 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17m2El-0000yk-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 21:12:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17m2Ej-0000yU-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 21:12:10 -0400 Original-Received: from vp190174.reshsg.uci.edu ([128.195.190.174] helo=becket.becket.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17m2Eg-0000xq-00; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 21:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17m2GO-0007Fe-00; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 18:13:52 -0700 Original-To: Tom Lord X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Tom-Swiftie: "My mouse buttons don't work," Tom said in a depressed voice In-Reply-To: <200209030057.RAA08617@morrowfield.regexps.com> Original-Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:906 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:906 Tom Lord writes: > Common Lisp and Emacs Lisp have SCM's behavior. No, Common Lisp and Emacs Lisp have (eq '() nil) -> t. > A while back I tried to flame the current guile developers into > submission on this point, but they are resiliant against such attacks. > The "restart old fights" bit is in reference to that flame war -- it's > just me obsequiously mentioning the design issue in a hopefully > neutral way. Perhaps they didn't submit, but rather actually *agreed* with the R5RS editors. Or is that just totally impossible?? _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user