From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Removing breakpoints/debugging stuff from CVS head Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 18:18:27 +0100 Message-ID: <42AC6E63.2030307@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <42ABEB72.7050706@ossau.uklinux.net> <66e540fe05061202582fe65fec@mail.gmail.com> <42AC257C.4020907@ossau.uklinux.net> <66e540fe05061206453d0d0d93@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118596574 22699 80.91.229.2 (12 Jun 2005 17:16:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Gnu , guile-devel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 12 19:16:10 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhW3x-0002DA-Sw for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:15:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhW8a-00027H-Fc for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:20:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhW7n-0001ok-9m for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:19:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhW7j-0001mr-Jd for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:19:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhW7j-0001mK-8k; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:19:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DhW7a-00017j-Ts; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:19:43 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns (host81-130-111-97.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.130.111.97]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814CB409FA7; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id B507E9F119; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 18:18:27 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Debian/1.7.8-1 X-Accept-Language: en Original-To: djurfeldt@nada.kth.se In-Reply-To: <66e540fe05061206453d0d0d93@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5107 gmane.lisp.guile.user:4628 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:4628 Mikael Djurfeldt wrote: > On 6/12/05, Neil Jerram wrote: > >>Can I just check that you're not misunderstanding me? > > > I did. You wrote that you would remove ice-9/debugger/*, so I thought > you would, for example, remove > guile-core/ice-9/debugger/command-loop.scm which is part of what > happens when you type (debug). Yes, I did say that - sorry, I didn't mean to. For the sake of reassurance (and review), I'll try again: ice-9/debugger.scm - leave as is, except for removal of calls to gds-* procedures ice-9/debugger/behaviour.scm - remove ice-9/debugger/breakpoints/* - remove ice-9/debugger/breakpoints.scm - remove ice-9/debugger/command-loop.scm - leave as is, except for removal of define-command forms for continue, finish, trace-finish, step, next ice-9/debugger/commands.scm - leave as is, except for removal of continue, finish, trace-finish, step, next, assert-continuable, and #:use-module forms for (ice-9 debugger behaviour) for (ice-9 debugger trap-hooks) ice-9/debugger/state.scm - leave as is ice-9/debugger/trap-hooks.scm - remove ice-9/debugger/trc.scm - leave as is ice-9/debugger/utils.scm - leave as is > > >>>And, if you decide to make guile-core releases without the debugger, >>>it might be a good idea if Marius or you consult with RMS first. >> >>I find it difficult to see why this should be needed. Do you still >>think this, taking into account my comments above? > > > Nope. I agree that, if the emacs interface is still under development, > one could postpone maintaining it in and releaseing it from the core > package. Thanks, and sorry for worrying you! Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel