From: Dirk Herrmann <dirk@sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: benchmarking framework
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 14:03:08 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42983.5010240369$1027253080@news.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3d6ti23gf.fsf@laruns.ossau.uklinux.net>
On 20 Jul 2002, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Did you consider using symbols rather than strings for "user:",
> "benchmark:" and so on? I think that would be more readable, and
> marginally easier to process programmatically as well.
You are right, I have changed "user:" to 'user and so on. I would have
liked to keep the colon for readability, but the printed form of 'user: is
even worse to read.
> Also, from the PHB department :-), is there a single headline number
> that could usefully be boiled down from these results?
I don't know which kind of information would be most useful here: One
might like to see the total execution time of the whole benchmarking suite
including the framework code, or one might want to see the summarized
execution time of the benchmarks only. Both would be easy to add. So,
what should be used for a summary - maybe even some different solution?
Best regards,
Dirk
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
next parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-21 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <m3d6ti23gf.fsf@laruns.ossau.uklinux.net>
2002-07-21 12:03 ` Dirk Herrmann [this message]
2002-10-25 22:30 benchmarking framework Thien-Thi Nguyen
[not found] <Pine.GSO.4.05.10207200332430.5632-100000@sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de>
2002-07-20 8:44 ` Neil Jerram
2002-07-20 12:13 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-07-20 12:46 ` Han-Wen
[not found] ` <15673.23455.874112.265246@blauw.xs4all.nl>
2002-07-20 14:01 ` Neil Jerram
2002-07-20 19:11 ` Rob Browning
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-20 2:13 Dirk Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='42983.5010240369$1027253080@news.gmane.org' \
--to=dirk@sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).