From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Making the -e option compatible with new versions of Guile 1.4 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:28:41 +0000 Message-ID: <41EC3C19.1010707@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <41E8581C.4050408@ossau.uklinux.net> <41EC12E3.4030605@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1106002623 26009 80.91.229.6 (17 Jan 2005 22:57:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 17 23:56:45 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cqfng-00077I-00 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:56:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CqfzY-0005Hr-PR for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:09:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cqfty-0002mQ-Op for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:03:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CqftU-0002cr-Eq for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:02:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CqftR-0002VZ-U7 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:02:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CqfNW-0001pz-68 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:29:42 -0500 Original-Received: from laruns (host81-130-108-27.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.130.108.27]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C63409FA9; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC436FA8C; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:28:41 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041007 Debian/1.7.3-5 X-Accept-Language: en Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4101 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:4101 Marius Vollmer wrote: > Neil Jerram writes: > > >> > Hmm, yes, in a debugger, your syntax could refer to all procedures >> > ever created. >> >>Hmm - not sure what you mean here by "all procedures". > > > I meant, it could refer to the (define ...) form as a point in a > program. Whenever that form is executed, the debugger might > instrument the created function so that the right thing happens (like > stopping on call when it is a breakpoint). > Ah, I see. That's the same as I meant by saying `it's pretty clear what someone would mean by "setting a breakpoint on internal-proc"' - I should have realized you meant the same thing :-) Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user