From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Linas Vepstas Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Checking for guile from configure -- forward compat. Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 11:59:57 -0500 Message-ID: <3ae3aa420908080959w13c1716cj6e2593f5418f451e@mail.gmail.com> References: Reply-To: linasvepstas@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249750820 7613 80.91.229.12 (8 Aug 2009 17:00:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 17:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Peter TB Brett Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 08 19:00:12 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MZpHA-0005V9-IB for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:00:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44709 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MZpHA-0002A9-3C for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 13:00:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MZpH2-00026k-LA for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 13:00:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MZpGx-00024K-D8 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 13:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50337 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MZpGx-000244-9P for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 12:59:59 -0400 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.242]:56576) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MZpGw-00057z-Dr for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 12:59:58 -0400 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b6so783821ana.21 for ; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 09:59:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=x103hsjrAGl/AnHVhaFdb1CvmR7MpAKJJVdd8xtvFuI=; b=Bni/7JAcyCFNd1tIY444YvJb0O/Tbe35czn+UAATDHwaQYLApyC4xTJb0GOGKPEnDM wo4wYPFYeVGZ1MDzzlWyUCzHxUo8tm8PImcZ1yqseyNmY/sIzUmUpyQv4HCft6xz9lwK l+11kYQUcBnA1VtnmQTSiK5zjD8pAKR5LmGiI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mDdiP/RL2vu63apPMnvHqMQIudYBvafJZkDwyWodjQjPyhgUN3ao+IWpwQOC+rsmeR RZE7ueYYpyOwPvYRzQtfpo8qhWx9X8DUKsH4LTRAesjoDBDzG5fU/mlu7kLjIT5Zu6Jw yFlykIM8Q0s3wPEtgYGrO6SbhPFC8iQMithek= Original-Received: by 10.100.3.13 with SMTP id 13mr1822499anc.29.1249750797052; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 09:59:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7396 Archived-At: 2009/8/8 Peter TB Brett : > Hi everyone, > > Currently, there appear to be two ways to check for the presence of > Guile: > > =C2=A0PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GUILE, [guile-1.8]) I believe that the following should work: PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GUILE, guile >=3D 1.8.3) or something like that. Grepping various configure.in I find the following: PKG_CHECK_MODULES(SQLITE3, sqlite3 >=3D 3.0.0) PKG_CHECK_MODULES([HUNSPELL], [hunspell]) PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBJDK, libjdk-1.5 >=3D $LIBJDK_REQUIRED) --linas