From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Llorens Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: A mess with GOOPS Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:22:14 +0100 Message-ID: <3CA0893C-405C-449C-AE1B-DC3BACEF182D@bluewin.ch> References: <87y5y5230u.fsf@pobox.com> <874nw494wx.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326294538 30802 80.91.229.12 (11 Jan 2012 15:08:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 11 16:08:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkznJ-0007cI-2W for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:08:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42992 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkznI-0001ze-Ci for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:08:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43297) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkaid-0000vX-LH for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:22:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkaiY-0007iF-7o for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:22:23 -0500 Original-Received: from zhbdzmsp-smta15.bluewin.ch ([195.186.99.132]:43675) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkaiX-0007hv-V9 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:22:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.186.227.130] ([195.186.227.130:54458] helo=zhhdzmsp-smta12.bluewin.ch) by zhbdzmsp-smta15.bluewin.ch (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 6F/87-20898-77D2C0F4; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:22:15 +0000 Original-Received: from [10.23.3.25] (128.179.67.121) by zhhdzmsp-smta12.bluewin.ch (8.5.142) (authenticated as dll@bluewin.ch) id 4E6F428B051E696B; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:22:15 +0000 In-Reply-To: <874nw494wx.fsf@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 195.186.99.132 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:03:50 -0500 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9130 Archived-At: On Jan 9, 2012, at 18:11, Andy Wingo wrote: > Ew. Why don't we instead allocate a typecode for arrays. I just pushed > a patch to do that, and for bitvectors as well. Copying Daniel Llorens, > to check that I didn't break arrays. I've just tested g3248c95 and I see no breakage. Thanks, Daniel