From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Zeeshan Ali Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: PHP to GUILE Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:34:56 +0300 Message-ID: <38294b7405092612341caa90f8@mail.gmail.com> References: <6efab235050925145055ba774c@mail.gmail.com> <87ll1k61w4.fsf@zip.com.au> <38294b7405092600273de6d37f@mail.gmail.com> <6efab23505092601173a0b89b5@mail.gmail.com> <38294b7405092610574c337f8e@mail.gmail.com> <6efab23505092612053fe5b4e8@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Zeeshan Ali NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1127763668 10405 80.91.229.2 (26 Sep 2005 19:41:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 26 21:41:07 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EJyoT-0000yd-M2 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:38:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EJyoT-0004fd-12 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:38:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EJykl-0003PK-AD for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EJykc-0003LK-Oj for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:34:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EJykc-0003AW-6N for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:34:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [72.14.204.207] (helo=qproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EJykc-0003Jp-0N for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:34:58 -0400 Original-Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id e12so466453qbe for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:34:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=biLMRnaCMjdKt3Ui1fB9E57LY3C7MujGyrYT+FMLaBvPSeq8OuppXiHTGkop0LQrCkfw5B0So/meAlhEJXTKBIOLE22fY5stS6AuxwMqN9ai7K0MLHFxsUblUwZJ/P0Dd5TxXXcMnWkmgym98ue4219Y25zofb0ek7Y9goe0Ygw= Original-Received: by 10.65.159.8 with SMTP id l8mr543720qbo; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:34:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.65.97.20 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:34:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Vorfeed Canal In-Reply-To: <6efab23505092612053fe5b4e8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4779 Archived-At: Hello again, > > Your conclusion is based on your ignorance. > > > Possible. Care to enlighten men ? I already did but you seem to be too eager to prove your point. > Ok. And then why your plugin-system never loaded this main module instead= ? Because i'ts the opposite, the maim module actually loads the plugin-system module. Please read the source, which is only one C file. > Ok. No problem. If this "is NOT an xchat plugin" but simple guile > module then it usable without xchat, right ? I didn't say that it's not related to xchat or the xchat-plugin that needs this module. > This means (use-modules > (xchat-guile plugin-system)) works, right ? Oops. It does not. > Conclusion: it's NOT guile module but part of xchat module. You seem to be very eager to derive conclusions. Your problem seems to be that you are making it an either/or situation (i-e either it's a 'pure' and 'independent' guile module or it's a pure and independent xchat plugin), which is not the case here. > It's > written in scheme but it does not make it guile module. Just like the > fact that your guile.so is written in C does not make it C library. In my last email i explicitly declared the main-module to be writen in C, so i am obviously not assuming anything like that. > > Since it's a guile module, IMHO it doesn't belong in directory for xcha= t plugins. > > > But it's NOT guile module - my simple test proved it. That's the problem. And i proved your test to be based on ignorance, perhaps you are better off coding in PHP. :) Anyway, thats my last email, if you dont get it this time either, stop calling my hard-work 'a mess'. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user