From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Maxime Devos via General Guile related discussions Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: RE: Where is the list of Guile maintainers? Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:11:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20241220161143.r3Bj2D0062kJuzj013Bjod@andre.telenet-ops.be> References: <20241220145949.r1zo2D00i2kJuzj061zo5v@michel.telenet-ops.be> Reply-To: Maxime Devos Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38560"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Nate Rosenbloom , Tom Whitcomb via General Guile related discussions Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 20 16:12:15 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tOefm-0009rU-Ul for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:12:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tOefN-0004jK-MQ; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:11:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tOefM-0004j6-AS for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:11:48 -0500 Original-Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be ([2a02:1800:120:4::f00:15]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tOefK-0002Ua-CB for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:11:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [IPv6:2a02:1811:8c0e:ef00:f87b:b2ea:4352:aa46] ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c0e:ef00:f87b:b2ea:4352:aa46]) by andre.telenet-ops.be with cmsmtp id r3Bj2D0062kJuzj013Bjod; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:11:43 +0100 Importance: normal X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: Where is the list of Guile maintainers? In-Reply-To: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r24; t=1734707503; bh=wsgDJIku+jxgWgnCafiMdWN/92RRoKrTRK+aTv5vAtc=; h=Message-ID:MIME-Version:To:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To: References:Content-Type:From; b=fZZitqB+O7kpwt/WEOOMrjyOfFwgPCj/lF13A0lD53/WQPbOikpsGzWKFxqKHjmtC NjzVw3anM7Tlj2DCDpab/1vDDHGtm00thfi7gEY+z05FMMlWGRuqyvP0ygVfVpPHZw lKareeGHy2sKFbUUith6Fb31EyBBlNS5mVHsHAt7ZLoiohPKv3BWwmdDXP2bRnfo+q h/mdaFfpTOeaN7u90dlN+tv61fvik3v4IkWs+jYq3JR5JvGwD4wmoOumSw8ihlc8RQ bFtK07Or1dcfL6XiWLCwYWyIAXSSqN9taT4aTHYyf5lapnF5WlPoR7W+6siAmAum91 TOSREUG+JO+9Q== Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:1800:120:4::f00:15; envelope-from=maximedevos@telenet.be; helo=andre.telenet-ops.be X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:20017 Archived-At: >According to the manual=C2=A0Ludovic Court=C3=A8s and Andy Wingo are the c= urrent maintainers. Although it hasn=E2=80=99t been updated in 5 years. https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/A-Scheme-of-Many-Mainta= iners.html > >But I guess that would be a good place to update if it=E2=80=99s changed. I recall hearing that Ludo=E2=80=99 left (or intended to leave?), so I don= =E2=80=99t trust it too much, and both don=E2=80=99t seem active with consi= dering Guile patches. Also, I=E2=80=99ve seen some other people accepting /= merging patches and there doesn=E2=80=99t appear to be a formal maintainer= /committer distinction here, I=E2=80=99d think there are some others as wel= l. I guess I=E2=80=99ll wait for some other replies. Best regards, Maxime Devos