From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [Wikidata] [ANN] nomunofu v0.1.0 Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 09:56:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20191223085617.GA14347@tuxteam.de> References: <3C3055B6-0BDC-444B-832F-C67477535E35@openlinksw.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="46829"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 23 09:56:52 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ijJWG-000C4o-E6 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 09:56:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54836 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ijJWE-0004ae-LG for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 03:56:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56959) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ijJVr-0004XP-RK for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 03:56:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ijJVq-0000pJ-Aw for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 03:56:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:37991) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ijJVp-0000EH-P8 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 03:56:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:Date; bh=3arr6fr9Q/auj+r1uH4oy9hRUUHqA2FcbfZQISrh1xU=; b=Up0x3nVtX9usJQeqUW2V7XkVQqmb3HFQFHYl2of1khueAIkS2eebUyni4qxRIEY//H1uoBvxU86fCYNwTXnoH0e8sLKsK1vCgf99ypZVaZAPTQLmTTEertW5NHARfFa6LkKrdT7iGbkMMHyzwxOWlPgxZeA6L35FghmD2PMgJg3TYzogGRqDJZW0dFoXvrW/dJFULymhflnGeKzOt3KRjkJ8P/B2w3mov+DlJcVb/Cq2X4pTJnVCqY+R1iKo6zkBpzEdhTw1lkN7VscVsymRa7HUs/KsJ8YKiJG0dOPbmDBAAFn+ulPn9c8y+lImiEe73MAxjor60FelDNH7yvUYqw==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ijJVh-0003wS-V4 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 09:56:17 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C3055B6-0BDC-444B-832F-C67477535E35@openlinksw.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 5.199.139.25 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:15969 Archived-At: --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 06:36:06PM -0500, Ted Thibodeau Jr via General Guil= e related discussions wrote: [...] > Hi, Amirouche -- >=20 > Kingsley's points about tuning Virtuoso to use available=20 > RAM [1] and other system resources are worth looking into,=20 > but a possibly more important first question is -- >=20 > Exactly what version of Virtuoso are you testing? >=20 > If you followed the common script on Ubuntu 18.04, i.e., -- >=20 > sudo apt update >=20 > sudo apt install virtuoso-opensource Hi, Ted I see you do have a stake in the game. That's fine, since having a good technical discussion should be independent of that. So thanks for chiming in! > -- then you likely have version 6.1.6 of VOS, the Open Source=20 > Edition of Virtuoso, which shipped 2012-08-02 [2], and is far > behind the latest version of both VOS (v7.2.5+) and Enterprise=20 > Edition (v8.3+)! Wouldn't that be something your company could contribute to Ubuntu/Debian? Contact the package maintainers and help keeping the free version of Virtuoso up to snuff on those platforms? A rising tide, etc? > You can also try Enterprise Edition at no cost for 30 days [5]. I think it's somewhat unfair to try to compare a freshly done free project with an established commercial one. > I'll be interested to hear your new results, with a current build, > and with proper INI tuning in place. Why not assist Amirouche on that part? After all, you have much easier access to Virtuoso expertise, and me, at least, rather prefer Amirouche to spend his time tuning his wonderful free creatures than tuning Virtuoso ;-P (of course, he'll end up doing what he enjoys most, I'd hope!). Cheers -- tom=C3=A1s --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAl4AgTEACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYymACeIJ57NoqaoybzcoLjjcVT/mPy X5IAn2yf6EtXDOstrj9ocwjOin9d554G =UFxO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh--