* Need help with macro
@ 2018-12-13 0:30 Mike Gran
2018-12-13 1:34 ` Mark H Weaver
2018-12-13 1:38 ` Alex Vong
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mike Gran @ 2018-12-13 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-user
Hey all,
I need help making a macro.
I have an existing procedure of the form
(call-method self method (...))
Note that SELF is a struct, METHOD is a string, and the ellipses can
be anything.
I would like to make a macro that transforms into the above, but, is
of the form
(send self (method ...))
where SELF is the same struct, METHOD is a literal symbol, and the
ellipses are unchanged.
For example, I would like to call
(send date (get-year))
(send date (set-year 2018))
(send date (set-dmy 1 1 2018))
and have it be
(call-method date "get-year" '())
(call-method date "set-year" (list 2018))
(call-method date "set-dmy" (list 1 1 2018))
I get hung up on figuring out how to handle the literal symbol and the
ellipses.
If you need context, see
https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GObjectIntrospection/HowToWriteALanguageBinding
Thanks in advance,
Mike Gran
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Need help with macro
2018-12-13 0:30 Need help with macro Mike Gran
@ 2018-12-13 1:34 ` Mark H Weaver
2018-12-13 18:14 ` Mike Gran
2018-12-13 1:38 ` Alex Vong
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark H Weaver @ 2018-12-13 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Gran; +Cc: guile-user
Hi Mike,
Mike Gran <spk121@yahoo.com> writes:
> Hey all,
>
> I need help making a macro.
>
> I have an existing procedure of the form
>
> (call-method self method (...))
>
> Note that SELF is a struct, METHOD is a string, and the ellipses can
> be anything.
>
> I would like to make a macro that transforms into the above, but, is
> of the form
>
> (send self (method ...))
>
> where SELF is the same struct, METHOD is a literal symbol, and the
> ellipses are unchanged.
>
> For example, I would like to call
>
> (send date (get-year))
> (send date (set-year 2018))
> (send date (set-dmy 1 1 2018))
>
> and have it be
>
> (call-method date "get-year" '())
> (call-method date "set-year" (list 2018))
> (call-method date "set-dmy" (list 1 1 2018))
>
> I get hung up on figuring out how to handle the literal symbol and the
> ellipses.
Here's a syntax-rules macro to do it:
(define-syntax send
(syntax-rules ()
((send self (method arg ...))
(call-method self (symbol->string 'method) `(,arg ...)))))
However, in this implementation, the 'symbol->string' call is deferred
to run time.
Here's a syntax-case macro that does the conversion at compile time:
(define-syntax send
(lambda (stx)
(syntax-case stx ()
((send self (method arg ...))
(identifier? #'method)
(with-syntax ((method-str (symbol->string
(syntax->datum #'method))))
#'(call-method self method-str `(,arg ...)))))))
This syntax-case macro also verifies at compile time that 'method' is a
bare identifier, via the guard (identifier? #'method).
Note that to generate the list of arguments, the simpler approach would
have been to write (list arg ...) instead of `(,arg ...). I chose to
use quasiquote mainly to benefit from an optimization in the quasiquote
macro, namely that `() expands into '(), which is preferable to (list).
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Need help with macro
2018-12-13 1:34 ` Mark H Weaver
@ 2018-12-13 18:14 ` Mike Gran
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mike Gran @ 2018-12-13 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark H Weaver; +Cc: guile-user
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 08:34:13PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Here's a syntax-rules macro to do it:
>
> (define-syntax send
> (syntax-rules ()
> ((send self (method arg ...))
> (call-method self (symbol->string 'method) `(,arg ...)))))
>
> However, in this implementation, the 'symbol->string' call is deferred
> to run time.
>
> Here's a syntax-case macro that does the conversion at compile time:
>
> (define-syntax send
> (lambda (stx)
> (syntax-case stx ()
> ((send self (method arg ...))
> (identifier? #'method)
> (with-syntax ((method-str (symbol->string
> (syntax->datum #'method))))
> #'(call-method self method-str `(,arg ...)))))))
Great! This is what I needed. Thanks for help.
-Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Need help with macro
2018-12-13 0:30 Need help with macro Mike Gran
2018-12-13 1:34 ` Mark H Weaver
@ 2018-12-13 1:38 ` Alex Vong
2018-12-13 18:15 ` Mike Gran
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alex Vong @ 2018-12-13 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Gran; +Cc: guile-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1414 bytes --]
Hello Mike,
Mike Gran <spk121@yahoo.com> writes:
> Hey all,
>
> I need help making a macro.
>
> I have an existing procedure of the form
>
> (call-method self method (...))
>
> Note that SELF is a struct, METHOD is a string, and the ellipses can
> be anything.
>
> I would like to make a macro that transforms into the above, but, is
> of the form
>
> (send self (method ...))
>
> where SELF is the same struct, METHOD is a literal symbol, and the
> ellipses are unchanged.
>
> For example, I would like to call
>
> (send date (get-year))
> (send date (set-year 2018))
> (send date (set-dmy 1 1 2018))
>
> and have it be
>
> (call-method date "get-year" '())
> (call-method date "set-year" (list 2018))
> (call-method date "set-dmy" (list 1 1 2018))
>
> I get hung up on figuring out how to handle the literal symbol and the
> ellipses.
>
> If you need context, see
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GObjectIntrospection/HowToWriteALanguageBinding
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Mike Gran
I think this would work:
(define-syntax-rule (send self (method args ...))
(call-method self
(symbol->string 'method)
(list args ...)))
For example,
(send date (set-dmy 1 1 2018))
will be expanded to
(call-method date
(symbol->string 'set-dmy)
(list 1 1 2018))
which is equivalent to
(call-method date "set-dmy" (list 1 1 2018))
Cheers,
Alex
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Need help with macro
2018-12-13 1:38 ` Alex Vong
@ 2018-12-13 18:15 ` Mike Gran
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mike Gran @ 2018-12-13 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Vong; +Cc: guile-user
>
> I think this would work:
>
> (define-syntax-rule (send self (method args ...))
> (call-method self
> (symbol->string 'method)
> (list args ...)))
>
> For example,
>
> (send date (set-dmy 1 1 2018))
>
> will be expanded to
>
> (call-method date
> (symbol->string 'set-dmy)
> (list 1 1 2018))
>
> which is equivalent to
>
> (call-method date "set-dmy" (list 1 1 2018))
>
Thanks for your help!
-Mike Gran
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-13 18:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-12-13 0:30 Need help with macro Mike Gran
2018-12-13 1:34 ` Mark H Weaver
2018-12-13 18:14 ` Mike Gran
2018-12-13 1:38 ` Alex Vong
2018-12-13 18:15 ` Mike Gran
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).