From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Mike Gran" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: on using 8cc in reproducible bootstrap process Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 07:53:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20170618145322.GA1568@joshua.dnsalias.com> References: <87d1a1csiw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1497797638 26418 195.159.176.226 (18 Jun 2017 14:53:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 14:53:58 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 18 16:53:48 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dMbaF-0006FE-Fa for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 16:53:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38619 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dMbaK-0005ek-Iv for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 10:53:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58135) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dMbZy-0005ed-7N for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 10:53:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dMbZu-0003Hh-Ar for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 10:53:30 -0400 Original-Received: from nm5-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.90.153]:43309) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dMbZu-0003HM-43 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 10:53:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1497797605; bh=M0cFJk3RvecjUTi/JyT9wzwETfziiZP+UXw/X0nVvWQ=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=jETsmw5+o+7LpwoE+y7lSgs36v6k+rWag0flbPZcHK2kXknum93FLozl2IJAPxtE2VdWSdXhSbxcrObm60Eg7nYyV9bxMYxgqg9EL2RQrsH/pjLlHd9x+PZzw+5NCU7KRgz3WHYTf4XKSO89NmkgTb7fR9Q752m7aveuraWiqQxXrLsYQlaPRiel7/3uiffn+FY1+yCuIRDACiNgIOYIlkBN55qG4cfSJ/naCvspR1mn7whEDEWJfbsYbcM4ncHwBQDSzF+i5mZg2VukkjYBQUfYoky+fyLA2zn6l82cEMgx4xHD3K8C5yUR3u0uNkFZ4FuGTk4cwnZb6J7Meh9sWg== Original-Received: from [98.138.101.128] by nm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Jun 2017 14:53:25 -0000 Original-Received: from [98.138.104.113] by tm16.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Jun 2017 14:53:24 -0000 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp222.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Jun 2017 14:53:24 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 986589.33294.bm@smtp222.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: WtXGdcQVM1kzry.ddvoAm9XlozjGT0b.RmKaiy7VnYl3fOv 6tnswAY1E90lRUbp68evWzRqnXBUeoT4CyMOAzxzOsf0qAxflD_NNXKPxjVd FO3sH3ca.MFSEZfYqB.83ycQ5ilN8HJhheDK.rZRYOdkbkKoJixHI_UhntGL 3PHDO5LruFcvFyIP8JCAysvqf5dwfrxosW2Uj7f8tIzXb0PQIvWEn9qpOIpD oJlCzLeblcDJiQBwH6M1aaMkg12eX6kRiuYbjme2FkNpXDqzFMnQAtikwSmy raIVjjMhRegbAs4t1HrWrqSMhRZFjvqkJIL7W0ljn0qTAdJFMO6uEgzoJJvG GihSJ.x6dTeaqDjXvcGMDcInDnksON_oM5krrnrSgqh4AHOCpn4q1RuvpU86 Yqfwj2TrLmFswh3WWq0r62cQY6UBmYaHPjGp1.Bw1wQhe2kme.ubuSy95WTE lsDvD8NoPcdHDZnZwtetnZDrnpI0VjSZDplxDm46rl3K05X9k.wLsGnjZ7jL .OXT8nm9EwCnG6qvwq5ZLfr4L_SURN7CIUPmoh.Se7tozNdscvmhHk00pPg- - X-Yahoo-SMTP: FzNaA9iswBDuBl1BmgaIRDaP9Q-- Original-Received: by joshua.spikycactus.dnsalias.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 18 Jun 2017 07:53:22 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d1a1csiw.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 98.138.90.153 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13848 Archived-At: On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 03:52:23PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Hi! > > The next leap forward is to compile gcc. I have been looking at > compiling Tinycc[3]. A couple of weeks ago, rain1 has been working with > the tcc developers to succeed in compiling gcc using tcc[4]. > which one would you advise, or do you have a better alternative? Should > I 1) learn about anonymous structs and make Mescc richer, or would you > like to (help and) take patches for 2)? For what it is worth, the hacker ragge and the OpenBSD community spent some time a couple of years ago getting the old PCC Porable C Compiler back up and running. Because it is based on a much older program, it may not have these new features with which you are struggling. http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/ -Mike Gran