From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile can't find a chinese named file Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:31:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20170215133143.GA12904@tuxteam.de> References: <578885360.4452806.1487105647708@mail.yahoo.com> <87r330cwhj.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <191859705.4469709.1487109121157@mail.yahoo.com> <20170214221914.1483ddb1@bother.homenet> <20170215091832.GA28017@tuxteam.de> <20170215101533.32b183bb@bother.homenet> <20170215114820.GA5999@tuxteam.de> <20170215121309.55e4556f@bother.homenet> <20170215124124.GB9630@tuxteam.de> <20170215131157.1fbd3060@bother.homenet> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487165548 27205 195.159.176.226 (15 Feb 2017 13:32:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:32:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 15 14:32:24 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdzh0-0006VI-0W for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:32:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40759 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdzh5-0008AV-Gz for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:32:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdzgd-0008A8-8R for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:32:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdzgZ-0005qn-9f for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:31:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:55259 helo=tomasium.tuxteam.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdzgZ-0005pW-3o for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:31:55 -0500 Original-Received: from tomas by tomasium.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cdzgO-0003RM-0u for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:31:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170215131157.1fbd3060@bother.homenet> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 5.199.139.25 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13228 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:11:57PM +0000, Chris Vine wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:41:24 +0100 > wrote: > [snip] > > What I don't like about the fluid is that it still doesn't give you > > an escape hatch in hard cases (your USB stick example). > > The program would just have to document that any mount point must have > a path in a character set (eg ASCII) which is compatible with the > filename encoding used by the plug-able device in question to which the > fluid is to be set. Yes, but exactly that is out of the application's control :-( > Not ideal, but in practice probably good enough for anyone using guile, > who is likely to be sufficiently knowledgeable to understand what this > means. None of the solutions bandied around are ideal, I fear. regards - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlikWD8ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kb5dgCdHJ4JbjrDAPBxeIOCMS9shjWq QlwAn3BP5p6He+N6fEqJiTUR9UzNES/P =zGLl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----