From: Chris Vine <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk>
To: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Potluck - thread safe event loop with await semantics
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:31:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160223003121.4ae217f1@dell.homenet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160222172804.6d40b0c3@capac>
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:28:04 -0300
David Pirotte <david@altosw.be> wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Nice work, tell us when uploaded as a git repo, I'd like to look at
> it when I have some time.
>
> > This is an example of how you might use a-sync with guile-gnome:
> > ...
>
> > However, it is more useful with guile-gnome's GTK+ callbacks, or
> > with glib file watches or timeouts, because although the glib main
> > loop is thread safe, the guile-gnome wrapper for it is not, and I
> > have had problems with worker threads posting with g-idle-add.
>
> This is not correct: Guile-Gnome [correctly] wraps glib, gdk and gtk
> and as such, provides the exact same functionality you'd have writing
> your app in C. Guile-Gnome does _not_introduce thread unsafety, it is
> neither more neither less 'powerful' wrt this thread
> problem/discussion, it just can't do 'better' then glib, gdk and gtk
> themselves. Here is a more accurate def of the thread safety
> characteristic of these 'modules' [1]:
>
> ...
> GLib is completely thread safe (all global data is
> automatically locked), but individual data structure instances are
> not automatically locked for performance reasons. So e.g. you must
> coordinate accesses to the same <g-hash-table> from multiple threads.
>
> -> GTK+ is "thread aware" but not thread safe; it provides a
> global lock controlled by gdk-threads-enter/gdk-threads-leave which
> protects all use of GTK+. That is, only one thread can use GTK+ at
> any given time.
>
> You must call g-thread-init and gdk-threads-init before
> executing any other GTK+ or GDK functions in a threaded GTK+ program.
>
> Idles, timeouts, and input functions are executed outside of
> the main GTK+ lock. So, if you need to call GTK+ inside of such a
> callback, you must surround the callback with a
> gdk-threads-enter/gdk-threads-leave pair. (However, signals are still
> executed within the main GTK+ lock.)
>
> -> In particular, this means, if you are writing widgets that
> might be used in threaded programs, you must surround timeouts and
> idle functions in this matter.
>
> As always, you must also surround any calls to GTK+ not made
> within a signal handler with a gdk-threads-enter/gdk-threads-leave
> pair. ...
David,
When I tested guile-gnome a few years ago I could reliably get
g-idle-add to crash when calling it from a worker thread. If that is
no longer the case I am pleased to hear it. However, the little test
program at the end[1], which prints to the screen every 1/10th of a
second, will also segfault for me if I run it in a terminal for
somewhere between 1 and 5 minutes. It seems to crash more readily if
it is in a terminal not on the current virtual desktop, but will in the
end crash even when it is.
As it happens, I am familiar with GTK+/glib thread safety. I have
written a library which depends on it. g_idle_add(), and the other
glib main loop functions, are and always have been completely thread
safe. As it happens, g-thread-init isn't wrapped, but there is no need
to call g_thread_init() anyway since glib >= 2.32. This is not to be
confused with invocation of the GDK global lock, which has nothing to
do with glib but is a GDK/GTK+ matter, and is now deprecated as of
GDK3/GTK+3 and has only ever worked on X (it has never worked on
windows and won't work on Wayland). The correct way to send events
from worker threads to GDK nowadays is using g_idle_add() and cognates.
If you are writing a library you might still need to use the deprecated
gdk_threads_add_idle() instead of g_idle_add() if you want to cater for
user programs which still use the deprecated GDK global lock, but not
otherwise.
On a separate matter, can you fix g-io-add-watch if that has not yet
happened? If you try to call it, compilation errors with:
ERROR: In procedure module-lookup: Unbound variable: <gio-channel>
It's been like that for a number of years and when I last tested did
not function in guile-gnome-platform-2.16.3.
It is off topic, but what guile-gnome really needs is a wrapper for
gobject-introspection.
Chris
[1] Test program:
-------------------------------
#! /usr/bin/guile-gnome-2 \
-e main -s
!#
(use-modules (gnome glib))
(define main-loop (g-main-loop-new #f #f))
(call-with-new-thread
(lambda ()
(let loop ()
(g-idle-add (lambda () (display "running ") #f))
(usleep 100000)
(loop))))
(display "Starting main loop\n")
(g-main-loop-run main-loop)
----------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-23 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-16 21:45 Potluck - thread safe event loop with await semantics Chris Vine
2016-02-22 12:01 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-02-22 16:36 ` Marko Rauhamaa
2016-02-22 17:40 ` Chris Vine
2016-02-22 17:53 ` Thompson, David
2016-02-22 18:12 ` Chris Vine
2016-02-22 19:54 ` Christopher Allan Webber
2016-02-22 20:28 ` David Pirotte
2016-02-23 0:31 ` Chris Vine [this message]
2016-02-23 1:30 ` Chris Vine
2016-02-23 19:55 ` David Pirotte
2016-02-23 6:25 ` David Pirotte
2016-02-23 12:09 ` Chris Vine
2016-02-23 16:49 ` Chris Vine
2016-02-25 23:22 ` David Pirotte
2016-02-23 4:58 ` Chris Vine
2016-03-01 20:39 ` Amirouche Boubekki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160223003121.4ae217f1@dell.homenet \
--to=chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).