From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: rixed@happyleptic.org Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Why do the compiler checks .go directory is writeable? Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:47:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20120912084709.GA16004@securactive.lan> References: <20120619144620.GA970@securactive.lan> <87d322q2tz.fsf@gnu.org> <87mx0wb5dc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347439659 31493 80.91.229.3 (12 Sep 2012 08:47:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:47:39 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 12 10:47:42 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TBibk-00079j-UE for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:47:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48014 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBibh-0003F5-EE for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:47:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37427) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBibY-0003Ey-A3 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:47:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBibR-0005fC-Uj for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:47:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eneide.happyleptic.org ([213.251.171.101]:53361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBibR-0005e3-PL for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:47:21 -0400 Original-Received: from extranet.securactive.org ([82.234.213.170] helo=ccellier.rd.securactive.lan) by eneide.happyleptic.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBioX-0007ex-QM for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:00:53 +0200 Original-Received: from rixed by ccellier.rd.securactive.lan with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TBibF-0006ej-QD for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:47:09 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: rixed@happyleptic.org, guile-user@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mx0wb5dc.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 213.251.171.101 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9582 Archived-At: -[ Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:45:51PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès ]---- > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > > > We basically want ???mkdir -p???, but we can even omit the stat(2) call upon > > EEXIST, because if DIR doesn???t point to a directory, the error will be > > caught soon after anyway. > > > > I???ll install the following patch if there???s no objection: > > Done, thanks! Thank you Ludo & all for dealing thoroughly any user complains however unimportant.