From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: rixed@happyleptic.org Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: or values bug? Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 07:51:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20111206065129.GB4125@shuttle.happyleptic.org> References: <20111205143331.GA2681@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323154313 23837 80.91.229.12 (6 Dec 2011 06:51:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:51:53 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 06 07:51:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RXosR-0003Sn-Ci for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:51:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49066 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXosQ-00054f-Vk for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:51:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXosM-00054P-6l for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:51:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXosL-0004R7-AI for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:51:38 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.1]:60361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXosK-0004Qm-R9 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:51:37 -0500 Original-Received: from shuttle.happyleptic.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:243c:2590:82ee:73ff:fe07:76f1]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548F394037A for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 07:51:30 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from rixed by shuttle.happyleptic.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RXosD-0001Af-4T for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:51:29 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: rixed@happyleptic.org, guile-user@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111205143331.GA2681@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 212.27.42.1 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9037 Archived-At: Thank you to both of you for the explanations and for looking for a solution so quickly. Anyway, I changed my code to not use this evil multiple value feature and I think I will keep away from this. Returning a list seams so much natural. Do you need me actualy fill a bugreport?