From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: rixed@happyleptic.org Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Problem compiling related to block-growth-factor fluid Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:43:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20111121104333.GA17397@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> References: <20111121092607.GA26768@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321872239 17717 80.91.229.12 (21 Nov 2011 10:43:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:43:59 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 21 11:43:55 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSRLq-00028Y-Rl for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:43:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46604 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSRLq-00017p-FQ for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:43:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34561) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSRLk-00017g-LW for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:43:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSRLg-0000aV-Hy for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:43:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eneide.happyleptic.org ([213.251.171.101]:44922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSRLg-0000aP-3v for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:43:40 -0500 Original-Received: from extranet.securactive.org ([82.234.213.170] helo=ccellier.rd.securactive.lan) by eneide.happyleptic.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RSRSY-0003O2-0E for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:50:46 +0100 Original-Received: from rixed by ccellier.rd.securactive.lan with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RSRLZ-0008Rv-MQ for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:43:33 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: rixed@happyleptic.org, guile-user@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111121092607.GA26768@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 213.251.171.101 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8965 Archived-At: -[ Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:26:07AM +0100, rixed@happyleptic.org ]---- > But on my dev machine (where I use a guile from the > stable-2 branch) it always worked. Actually, it always worked because my setup was slightly different and not because of the different version of guile, since it failed as well with my recent guile when using the prod setup on my dev host. So the problem might not have already been fixed.