From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: rixed@happyleptic.org Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Why 3 different evaluators? Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:29:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20111117052919.GA1487@happyleptic.org> References: <20111116050005.GA19554@happyleptic.org> <8739domn0s.fsf@pobox.com> <20111116101708.GA18426@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> <87d3crlx7p.fsf@pobox.com> <1321472632.6080.YahooMailNeo@web37902.mail.mud.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321507780 32399 80.91.229.12 (17 Nov 2011 05:29:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 05:29:40 +0000 (UTC) To: "guile-user@gnu.org" Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 17 06:29:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQuXX-0003QN-Tf for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:29:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55455 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQuXX-0004Za-17 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:29:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34827) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQuXT-0004ZK-De for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:29:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQuXS-0000mS-D2 for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:29:31 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.1]:59429) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQuXR-0000mB-SM for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:29:30 -0500 Original-Received: from acer.happyleptic.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:243c:2590:222:68ff:feac:7ea4]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id ADC1F9402DA for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:29:22 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by acer.happyleptic.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:29:21 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: rixed@happyleptic.org, "guile-user@gnu.org" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1321472632.6080.YahooMailNeo@web37902.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 212.27.42.1 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8960 Archived-At: -[ Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:43:52AM -0800, Mike Gran ]---- > I believe that you can still run the whole test suite on the C evaluator > by erasing all the .go files from the modules lib, setting auto compile off, > then running the check-guile script. I though it would run the evaluator written in scheme in that case.