From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: rixed@happyleptic.org Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: debugging guile runtime Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:24:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20110829162400.GB21699@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> References: <20110829125030.GB30079@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1314635058 15030 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2011 16:24:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:24:18 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 29 18:24:14 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy4dC-0007GB-Oy for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:24:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46102 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy4dB-0005gT-QN for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:24:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37483) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy4d8-0005el-8M for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy4d5-0003PY-Rd for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eneide.happyleptic.org ([213.251.171.101]:60963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy4d5-0003PI-C4 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:24:07 -0400 Original-Received: from extranet.securactive.org ([82.234.213.170] helo=ccellier.rd.securactive.lan) by eneide.happyleptic.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy4d3-0006dX-Jb for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:24:05 +0200 Original-Received: from rixed by ccellier.rd.securactive.lan with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy4cy-0005ia-GX for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:24:00 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: rixed@happyleptic.org, guile-user@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 213.251.171.101 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8746 Archived-At: -[ Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:35:20PM +0800, Nala Ginrut ]---- > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:50 PM, wrote: > > #4 fork does not close all open files. > > > > well, I got the same question, will fork auto close in Guile or should I > close it myself? Sorry I did not report the problem very well. The trouble is not with fork itself but with open-process, which is not actually part of the runtime but rather part of ice-9 popen module.