From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: rixed@happyleptic.org
Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user
Subject: Re: Is this a bug?
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:27:25 +0200
Message-ID: <20110829112725.GA12774@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan>
References: <20110816123610.GA8991@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan>
	<87ipppcbcm.fsf@yeeloong.netris.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1314617265 16449 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2011 11:27:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:27:45 +0000 (UTC)
To: guile-user@gnu.org
Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 29 13:27:40 2011
Return-path: <guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Qy00C-0007wO-8o
	for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:27:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54283 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Qy00B-00070b-BA
	for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:27:39 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52177)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>) id 1Qy008-00070T-59
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:27:36 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>) id 1Qy007-0008UT-Ge
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:27:36 -0400
Original-Received: from eneide.happyleptic.org ([213.251.171.101]:60266)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>) id 1Qy007-0008U1-CL
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:27:35 -0400
Original-Received: from extranet.securactive.org ([82.234.213.170]
	helo=ccellier.rd.securactive.lan)
	by eneide.happyleptic.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>) id 1Qy000-0006Sk-BB
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:27:28 +0200
Original-Received: from rixed by ccellier.rd.securactive.lan with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>) id 1Qxzzx-0003KQ-RF
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:27:25 +0200
Mail-Followup-To: rixed@happyleptic.org, guile-user@gnu.org
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87ipppcbcm.fsf@yeeloong.netris.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Received-From: 213.251.171.101
X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Guile related discussions <guile-user.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/guile-user>
List-Post: <mailto:guile-user@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8742
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user/8742>

> The problem is that the compiler, while compiling test.scm, sees no
> syntax declaration of `without-exception', and therefore assumes that
> `without-exception' is simply a top-level variable.

So, according to you, should I fill a bug report or I am overusing the
load directive ?